2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000jc000766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the alongshore current on barred beaches

Abstract: Abstract. Mean alongshore currents observed on two barred beaches are compared with predictions based on the one-dimensional, time-and depth-averaged alongshore momentum balance between forcing (by breaking waves, wind, and 10-100 km scale alongshore surface slopes), bottom stress, and lateral mixing. The observations span 500 hours at Egmond, Netherlands, and 1000 hours at Duck, North Carolina, and include a wide range of conditions with maximum mean currents of 1.4 m/s. Including rollers in the wave forcing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

15
244
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
15
244
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We analyzed the effect of different θ for SLR = 0.4 and 0.8 m by varying θ between 0 • (shore-normal) and 33.75 • (Table 2). This large range of θ is considered reasonable given the field measurement by Ruessink et al (2001). SLR projections of 0.4 and 0.8 m were chosen to analyze the impact for different θ because they span the most likely SLR scenarios (low and high) for this century in the North Sea basin.…”
Section: Hydrodynamical Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyzed the effect of different θ for SLR = 0.4 and 0.8 m by varying θ between 0 • (shore-normal) and 33.75 • (Table 2). This large range of θ is considered reasonable given the field measurement by Ruessink et al (2001). SLR projections of 0.4 and 0.8 m were chosen to analyze the impact for different θ because they span the most likely SLR scenarios (low and high) for this century in the North Sea basin.…”
Section: Hydrodynamical Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where β rol is the angle of the wave/roller interface, usually assumed to be 0.1 or less (Ruessink et al, 2001). Wave conditions are prescribed offshore (H rms off , θ off and ω a = 2π/T p , where T p is the peak period).…”
Section: Hydrodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually a single parameter is adjusted, the saturation ratio of rms wave height over water depth, γ b , which is considered to be a free model parameter (Lippmann et al, 1996;Apotsos et al, 2007). In order to model longshore current profiles accurately, especially on beaches comprising shore-parallel bars, the inclusion of the surface rollers as well as the forcing by wind and tidal waves was proved to be essential (Reniers et al, 1997;Feddersen et al, 1998;Ruessink et al, 2001). Ruessink et al (2001) used data collected near Egmond aan Zee (the Netherlands, Coast3D experiment) and near Duck (USA, Duck94 experiment) in order to validate the results of a 1D model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the roller energy dissipation rate, D r , in Eq. (5) is modelled following (Ruessink et al 2001), where the angle of the wave/roller interface, β rol , is assumed to be 0.1 or less.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%