Tazarotene (AGN 190168) is a new acetylenic retinoid which is effective for the topical treatment of patients with stable plaque psoriasis and mild to moderate acne vulgaris. Topical gel application provides direct delivery of tazarotene into the skin. At 10 hours after a topical application of 0.1% tazarotene gel to the skin of healthy individuals and patients with psoriasis, approximately 4 to 6% of the dose resided in the stratum corneum and 2% of the dose distributed to the viable epidermis and dermis. Tazarotene is rapidly hydrolysed by esterases to its active metabolite, tazarotenic acid. Tazarotenic acid does not accumulate in adipose tissue, but undergoes further metabolism to its sulfoxide and to other polar metabolites and is rapidly eliminated via both urinary and faecal pathways with a terminal half-life of about 18 hours. Percutaneous absorption is similar between healthy individuals and patients with facial acne, leading to plasma concentrations below 1 microg/L. The systemic bioavailability of tazarotene (measured as tazarotenic acid) is low, approximately 1% after single and multiple topical applications to healthy skin. In patients with psoriasis under typical conditions of use, systemic bioavailability increased during the initial 2 weeks of treatment from 1% (single dose) to 5% or less (steady state). The increased bioavailability is probably related to decreases in plaque elevation and scaling due to successful treatment, resulting in a less effective skin penetration barrier to tazarotene. Steady-state concentrations of tazarotenic acid are achieved within 2 weeks of topical treatment in both healthy and psoriatic skin types. The large variability in plasma concentrations observed in patients with psoriasis is probably because of the large differences in lesional skin condition, the amount of drug applied and the surface area of application. There was no significant drug accumulation in the body with long term treatment of patients with psoriasis. Topical administration of tazarotene requires dosages much smaller than those usually required for oral retinoids, such as isotretinoin, acitretin and etretinate, and it delivers the drug directly into the target skin tissues. The low systemic absorption and rapid systemic elimination of tazarotene and tazarotenic acid results in limited systemic exposure. Thus, topical tazarotene has a low potential for systemic adverse effects and is effective in the treatment of patients with acne and psoriasis.
Critical reagents are essential components of ligand binding assays (LBAs) and are utilized throughout the process of drug discovery, development, and post-marketing monitoring. Successful lifecycle management of LBA critical reagents minimizes assay performance problems caused by declining reagent activity and can mitigate the risk of delays during preclinical and clinical studies. Proactive reagent management assures adequate supply. It also assures that the quality of critical reagents is appropriate and consistent for the intended LBA use throughout all stages of the drug development process. This manuscript summarizes the key considerations for the generation, production, characterization, qualification, documentation, and management of critical reagents in LBAs, with recommendations for antibodies (monoclonal and polyclonal), engineered proteins, peptides, and their conjugates. Recommendations are given for each reagent type on basic and optional characterization profiles, expiration dates and storage temperatures, and investment in a knowledge database system. These recommendations represent a consensus among the authors and should be used to assist bioanalytical laboratories in the implementation of a best practices program for critical reagent life cycle management.
The pharmacokinetic profiles of 0.3% ofloxacin and 0.3% tobramycin ophthalmic solutions after multiple administrations in the eyes of 160 healthy volunteers were evaluated. In human tears, ofloxacin and tobramycin were found to have terminal half-lives of 226 and 154 minutes, respectively. The mean residence time in the ocular tear fluid was 326 minutes for ofloxacin and 106 minutes for tobramycin. The mean duration of time that ofloxacin remained above the MIC90 value for five bacterial species evaluated was 605 minutes, compared with 251 minutes for tobramycin. The mean area under the inhibitory curve for the five bacterial species evaluated was greater for ofloxacin (2224) compared with tobramycin (1549). The duration of time above the MIC90 for ofloxacin was longer compared with tobramycin for gram-positive isolates. Overall, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of ofloxacin were superior to those of tobramycin for most parameters studied.
The uptake and efflux of doxorubicin (Dox) were investigated in a human bladder cancer cell line (UM-UC-6) and in a multi-drug resistant (mdr) subline (UM-UC-6Dox). Unlike previous reports, the initial uptake kinetics of Dox, and its accumulation and retention to steady-state were modelled mathematically. Cells were incubated with Dox and the amount of Dox in the cellular and medium phases was measured by a specific HPLC method. When monitored for 1 min from 0.02 microM to 25 microM Dox, the uptake was very rapid but was significantly faster in the resistant cell line. The initial rate of uptake at t = 0 followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics yielding Vmax values (the maximal rate of uptake) of 15.0 +/- 1.7 and 12.9 +/- 1.2 nmol/10(6)/min and Km (rate at Vmax/2) of 25.2 +/- 4.7 and 16.4 +/- 2.9 microM for UM-UC-6 and UM-UC-6Dox, respectively. There was no metabolism of Dox by keto-reduction or reductive hydrolysis. At 1.0 microM the uptake of Dox to steady-state was biexponential but there was no difference in total cellular Dox concentration between the two cell lines at equilibrium. A 3 compartment sequential closed model was fitted yielding significantly different values for the intercompartmental and hybrid rate constants, indicating altered intracellular distribution in resistant cells. Verapamil (10 microM), trifluoperazine (10 microM) or Tween 80 (0.005%) had no effect on the uptake or efflux of Dox. The UM-UC-6Dox line appeared to show atypical mdr characteristics since net drug accumulation was not lowered and classic P-glycoprotein inhibitors were not effective. The primary mechanism of Dox resistance is not enhanced metabolism or lowered intracellular concentrations.
1. In vitro metabolism of 14C-brimonidine by the rat, rabbit, dog, monkey and human liver fractions was studied to assess any species differences. In vitro metabolism with rabbit liver aldehyde oxidase and human liver slices, and in vivo metabolism in rats were also investigated. The hepatic and urinary metabolites were characterized by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. 2. Up to seven, six, 11 and 14 metabolites were detected in rat liver S9 fraction, human liver S9 fraction, human liver slices and rat urine respectively. Rabbit liver aldehyde oxidase catalysed the metabolism of brimonidine to 2-oxobrimonidine and 3-oxobrimonidine, and further oxidation to the 2,3-dioxobrimonidine. Menadione inhibited the liver aldehyde oxidase-mediated oxidation. 3. Hepatic oxidation of brimonidine to 2-oxobrimonidine, 3-oxobrimonidine and 2,3-dioxobrimonidine was a major pathway in all the species studied, except the dog whose prominent metabolites were 4',5'-dehydrobrimonidine and 5-bromo-6-guanidinoquinoxaline. 4. These results indicate extensive hepatic metabolism of brimonidine and provide evidence for aldehyde oxidase involvement in brimonidine metabolism. The species differences in hepatic brimonidine metabolism are likely related to the low activity of dog liver aldehyde oxidase. The principal metabolic pathways of brimonidine are alpha(N)-oxidation to the 2,3-dioxobrimonidine, and oxidative cleavage of the imidazoline ring to 5-bromo-6-guanidinoquinoxaline.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.