One of the main problems of hydrologic/hydrodynamic routing models is defining the right set of parameters, especially on inaccessible and/or large basins. Remote sensing techniques provide measurements of the basin topography, drainage system, and channel width; however current methods for estimating riverbed elevation are not as accurate. This paper presents methods of altimetry data assimilation (DA) for estimating effective bathymetry of a hydrodynamic model. We tested past altimetry observations from satellites ENVISAT, ICESAT, and JASON 2 and synthetic altimetry data from satellites ICESAT 2, JASON 3, SARAL, and Surface Water and Ocean Topography to assess future/present mission's potential. The DA methods used were direct insertion, linear interpolation, the Shuffled Complex Evolution‐University of Arizona optimization algorithm, and an adapted Kalman filter developed with hydraulically based variance and covariance introduced in this paper. The past satellite altimetry DA was evaluated comparing simulated and observed water surface elevation while the synthetic altimetry DA were assessed through a direct comparison with a true bathymetry. The Shuffled Complex Evolution‐University of Arizona and hydraulically based Kalman filter methods presented the best performances, reducing water surface elevation error in 65% in past altimetry data experiment and reducing biased bathymetry error in 75% in the synthetic experiment; however, the latter method is much less computationally expensive. Regarding satellites, it was observed that the performance is related to the satellite intertrack distance, as higher number of observation sites allows more accurate bed elevation estimation.

No abstract

No abstract

Tens of thousands of dams were built around the world to reduce flood risks, produce energy, and maximize benefits of limited freshwater resources. In Brazil, the main and largest reservoirs are related to hydropower plants. Improving the understanding of reservoir dynamics is important not only to evaluate their impact in the flow regime of Brazilian rivers, but also to simulate the combined effect of constructing new dams and potential alterations under future climatic conditions. Here, we analyze how an ideal representation of reservoirs in terms of forced discharge would improve a previously calibrated hydrological model under the Brazilian domain. We forced the continental-scale version of the MGB model on observed reservoir outflows from 109 hydropower dams, which are part of the Brazilian National Interconnected System controlled by the National Electrical System Operator. Model simulated flows were replaced by the reservoir outflows in all dam locations and were compared to the original discharge in downstream gauges. The forced discharge simulation presented a mean improvement for Kling-Gupta Efficiency of 21%, when compared to the original model (naturalized flow). This analysis is a preliminary step towards an explicit representation of the reservoirs in the model, what will be conducted in a future study.

Evapotranspiration (ET) connects the land to the atmosphere, linking water, energy, and carbon cycles. ET is an essential climate variable with a fundamental importance, and accurate assessments of the spatiotemporal trends and variability in ET are needed from regional to continental scales. This study compared eight global actual ET datasets (ETgl) and the average actual ET ensemble (ETens) based on remote sensing, climate reanalysis, land-surface, and biophysical models to ET computed from basin-scale water balance (ETwb) in South America on monthly time scale. The 50 small-to-large basins covered major rivers and different biomes and climate types. We also examined the magnitude, seasonality, and interannual variability of ET, comparing ETgl and ETens with ETwb. Global ET datasets were evaluated between 2003 and 2014 from the following datasets: Breathing Earth System Simulator (BESS), ECMWF Reanalysis 5 (ERA5), Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS), Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM), MOD16, Penman–Monteith–Leuning (PML), Operational Simplified Surface Energy Balance (SSEBop) and Terra Climate. By using ETwb as a basis for comparison, correlation coefficients ranged from 0.45 (SSEBop) to 0.60 (ETens), and RMSE ranged from 35.6 (ETens) to 40.5 mm·month−1 (MOD16). Overall, ETgl estimates ranged from 0 to 150 mm·month−1 in most basins in South America, while ETwb estimates showed maximum rates up to 250 mm·month−1. ETgl varied by hydroclimatic regions: (i) basins located in humid climates with low seasonality in precipitation, including the Amazon, Uruguay, and South Atlantic basins, yielded weak correlation coefficients between monthly ETgl and ETwb, and (ii) tropical and semiarid basins (areas where precipitation demonstrates a strong seasonality, as in the São Francisco, Northeast Atlantic, Paraná/Paraguay, and Tocantins basins) yielded moderate-to-strong correlation coefficients. An assessment of the interannual variability demonstrated a disagreement between ETgl and ETwb in the humid tropics (in the Amazon), with ETgl showing a wide range of interannual variability. However, in tropical, subtropical, and semiarid climates, including the Tocantins, São Francisco, Paraná, Paraguay, Uruguay, and Atlantic basins (Northeast, East, and South), we found a stronger agreement between ETgl and ETwb for interannual variability. Assessing ET datasets enables the understanding of land–atmosphere exchanges in South America, to improvement of ET estimation and monitoring for water management.

Hydrodynamic models are important tools for simulating river water level and flow. A considerable fraction of the hydrodynamic model errors are related to parameters uncertainties. As cross sections bottom levels considerably affect water level simulation, this parameter has to be well estimated for flood studies. Automatic calibration performance and processing time depend on the search space dimension, which is related to the number of calibrated parameters. This paper shows the application of the Shuffled Complex Evolution (SCE-UA) optimization algorithm to assess the number of cross sections bottom levels used in calibration. Also was evaluated the extent of algorithm exploration regarding computational processing time and accuracy. It was tested the calibration of 2, 4, 7 and 10 cross sections bottom levels (2PAR, 4PAR, 7PAR and 10PAR calibration configurations) of a 1,100 km reach of the Madeira River. 7PAR and 10PAR representation had better fitness (lower objective function value) on cross sections used for calibration; however, the error on other cross sections (2 validation gauging stations) was higher than 2PAR and 4PAR calibration. The short number (5) of gauging stations used in calibration has limited the number of calibrated parameters to represent adequately the river level profile. Finally, this paper shows a contribution for the parsimonious selection of parameters regarding the spatial distribution of observation sites used in calibration.

No abstract

Reservoirs considerably affect river streamflow and need to be accurately represented in environmental impact studies. Modeling reservoir outflow represents a challenge to hydrological studies since reservoir operations vary with flood risk, economic and demand aspects. The Brazilian Interconnected Energy System (SIN) is an example of a unique and complex system of coordinated operation composed by more than 160 large reservoirs. We proposed and evaluated an integrated approach to simulate daily outflows from most of the SIN reservoirs (138) using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model, distinguishing run-of-the-river and storage reservoirs and testing cases whether outflow and level data were available as input. Also, we investigated the influence of the proposed input features (14) on the simulated outflow, related to reservoir water balance, seasonality, and demand. As a result, we verified that the outputs of the ANN model were mainly influenced by local water balance variables, such as the reservoir inflow of the present day and outflow of the day before. However, other features such as the water level of 4 large reservoirs that represent different regions of the country, which infers about hydropower demand through water availability, seemed to influence to some extent reservoirs outflow estimates. This result indicates advantages in using an integrated approach rather than looking at each reservoir individually. In terms of data availability, it was tested scenarios with (WITH_Qout) and without (NO_Qout and SIM_Qout) observed outflow and water level as input features to the ANN model. The NO_Qout model is trained without outflow and water level while the SIM_Qout model is trained with all input features, but it is fed with simulated outflows and water levels rather than observations. These 3 ANN models were compared with two simple benchmarks: outflow is equal to the outflow of the day before (STEADY) and the outflow is equal to the inflow of the same day (INFLOW). For run-of-the-river reservoirs, an ANN model is not necessary as outflow is virtually equal to inflow. For storage reservoirs, the ANN estimates reached median Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies (NSE) of 0.91, 0.77 and 0.68 for WITH_, NO_ and SIM_Qout respectively, compared to a median NSE of 0.81 and 0.29 for the STEADY and INFLOW benchmarks respectively. In conclusion, the ANN models presented satisfactory performances: when outflow observations are available, WITH_Qout model outperforms STEADY; otherwise, NO_Qout and SIM_Qout models outperform INFLOW.