No abstract

No abstract

Seronegative myasthenia gravis (MG) presents a serious gap in MG diagnosis and understanding. We applied a cell based assay (CBA) for the detection of muscle specific kinase (MuSK) antibodies undetectable by radioimmunoassay. We tested 633 triple-seronegative MG patients' sera from 13 countries, detecting 13% as positive. MuSK antibodies were found, at significantly lower frequencies, in 1.9% of healthy controls and 5.1% of other neuroimmune disease patients, including multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica. The clinical data of the newly diagnosed MuSK-MG patients are presented. 27% of ocular seronegative patients were MuSK antibody positive. Moreover, 23% had thymic hyperplasia suggesting that thymic abnormalities are more common than believed.

Background and purpose Myasthenia gravis (MG) patients could be a vulnerable group in the pandemic era of coronavirus 2019 (COVID‐19) mainly due to respiratory muscle weakness, older age and long‐term immunosuppressive treatment. We aimed to define factors predicting the severity of COVID‐19 in MG patients and risk of MG exacerbation during COVID‐19. Methods We evaluated clinical features and outcomes after COVID‐19 in 93 MG patients. Results Thirty‐five patients (38%) had severe pneumonia and we recorded 10 deaths (11%) due to COVID‐19. Higher forced vital capacity (FVC) values tested before COVID‐19 were shown to be protective against severe infection (95% CI 0.934–0.98) as well as good control of MG measured by the quantified myasthenia gravis score (95% CI 1.047–1.232). Long‐term chronic corticosteroid treatment worsened the course of COVID‐19 in MG patients (95% CI 1.784–111.43) and this impact was positively associated with dosage ( p = 0.005). Treatment using azathioprine (95% CI 0.448–2.935), mycophenolate mofetil (95% CI 0.91–12.515) and ciclosporin (95% CI 0.029–2.212) did not influence the course of COVID‐19. MG patients treated with rituximab had a high risk of death caused by COVID‐19 (95% CI 3.216–383.971). Exacerbation of MG during infection was relatively rare (15%) and was not caused by remdesivir, convalescent plasma or favipiravir (95% CI 0.885–10.87). Conclusions As the most important predictors of severe COVID‐19 in MG patients we identified unsatisfied condition of MG with lower FVC, previous long‐term corticosteroid treatment especially in higher doses, older age, the presence of cancer, and recent rituximab treatment.

No abstract

Summary:High-dose immunoablative chemotherapy with autologous haematopoietic cell support might be beneficial in the treatment of intractable forms of MS. We mobilised PBPC in 11 patients with secondary progressive MS and finally eight patients were grafted after high-dose BEAM chemotherapy with either in vitro or in vivo T cell depletion. Median EDSS and SNRS scores at the time of inclusion were 6.5 (6.5-7.5) and 56 (44-65), respectively. PBPC mobilisation was safe with no serious adverse effects, and without significant aggravation of disability.

Intrathecal IgG antibodies to NFL were elevated in MS patients compared with that in CD patients (P = 0.001) and were not related to clinical variables. No differences in IgM anti-NFL levels were found between the MS and CN/CD groups. IgM to NFL was higher in the CDEG group than in either the CD group or even the MS group (P < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS - Intrathecal IgM or IgG antibodies to NFL are not useful surrogate markers for axonal damage or disease subtypes in MS.

Neurofilaments are cytoskeletal proteins localized within axons, which may interact with the immune system during and following tissue destruction in multiple sclerosis (MS). Antibodies against the medium neurofilament subunit synthesized intrathecally may reflect axonal damage in MS patients. Both immunoglobulin G (IgG) and M (IgM) responses against the purified native medium subunit of neurofilaments (NFM) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were determined in paired serum and cerebrospinal fluid samples obtained from 49 MS patients, 16 normal controls (CN), 21 control patients with miscellaneous diseases (CD) and 14 patients with neurodegenerative disorders (CDEG). Intrathecal production of IgM and IgG antibodies to NFM were elevated in MS patients compared with the CN or CD groups (p<0.04 for IgM, p<0.01 for IgG). The increase was present in all the MS courses (relapsing-remitting, primary and secondary progressive). Similar local anti-NFM IgG and IgM synthesis occurred in the MS and CDEG groups. MS patients with short and long disease duration did not differ in terms of their anti-NFM IgM and IgG responses. Repeated examinations showed stable intrathecal anti-NFM production. Intrathecal IgG and IgM antibodies against NFM were increased in MS patients and may serve as a potential marker for axonal pathology. The extent of anti-NFM levels did not correspond to any individualized clinical profiles of MS patients.