Abstract-The objective of this report was to develop a case definition of distal symmetric polyneuropathy to standardize and facilitate clinical research and epidemiologic studies. A formalized consensus process was employed to reach agreement after a systematic review and classification of evidence from the literature. The literature indicates that symptoms alone have relatively poor diagnostic accuracy in predicting the presence of polyneuropathy; signs are better predictors of polyneuropathy than symptoms; and single abnormalities on examination are less sensitive than multiple abnormalities in predicting the presence of polyneuropathy. The combination of neuropathic symptoms, signs, and electrodiagnostic findings provides the most accurate diagnosis of distal symmetric polyneuropathy. A set of case definitions was rank ordered by likelihood of disease. The highest likelihood of polyneuropathy (useful for clinical trials) occurs with a combination of multiple symptoms, multiple signs, and abnormal electrodiagnostic studies. A modest likelihood of polyneuropathy (useful for field or epidemiologic studies) occurs with a combination of multiple symptoms and multiple signs when the results of electrodiagnostic studies are not available. A lower likelihood of polyneuropathy occurs when electrodiagnostic studies and signs are discordant. For research purposes, the best approach to defining distal symmetric polyneuropathy is a set of case definitions rank ordered by estimated likelihood of disease. The inclusion of this formalized case definition in clinical and epidemiologic research studies will ensure greater consistency of case selection.
We reviewed 44 cases of ischemia and infarction of the spinal cord at two university hospitals. Three patients experienced transient ischemic attacks. Etiologies of completed strokes were diverse and included rupture and surgical repair of aortic aneurysms, aortic dissection, aortic rupture and thrombosis, global ischemia, anterior spinal artery embolism, repair and thrombosis of spinal arteriovenous malformations, hematomyelia, epidural hematoma, cervical osteophytosis, celiac plexus block, systemic lupus erythematosus, coagulopathy, and decompression sickness. Motor function improved in 12 patients, was substantial in only one, and occurred largely within the first 2 to 4 weeks. Favorable ambulatory outcome correlated with improving neurologic examinations and relatively preserved strength in hip abductors and knee extensors. More extensive deficits without initial improvement portended a more severe prognosis. Autonomic dysfunction, pain, paresthesia, and depression were common and impeded recovery in some patients. The mean level of deficit was at T-8 and in cases of global ischemia was at T-9, which leads us to dispute the classical view of a midthoracic watershed zone of ischemic vulnerability near T-4.
Introduction
: Eculizumab is effective and well tolerated in patients with antiacetylcholine receptor antibody‐positive refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG; REGAIN; NCT01997229). We report an interim analysis of an open‐label extension of REGAIN, evaluating eculizumab's long‐term safety and efficacy.
Methods
: Eculizumab (1,200 mg every 2 weeks for 22.7 months [median]) was administered to 117 patients.
Results
: The safety profile of eculizumab was consistent with REGAIN; no cases of meningococcal infection were reported during the interim analysis period. Myasthenia gravis exacerbation rate was reduced by 75% from the year before REGAIN (
P
< 0.0001). Improvements with eculizumab in activities of daily living, muscle strength, functional ability, and quality of life in REGAIN were maintained through 3 years; 56% of patients achieved minimal manifestations or pharmacological remission. Patients who had received placebo during REGAIN experienced rapid and sustained improvements during open‐label eculizumab (
P
< 0.0001).
Discussion
: These findings provide evidence for the long‐term safety and sustained efficacy of eculizumab for refractory gMG.
Muscle Nerve
2019
We assessed the influence of race, sex, and puberty upon clinical features and outcome in 115 patients with autoimmune juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG). These demographic variables influenced not only disease incidence but also disease severity, response to therapy, and outcome, despite comparable therapeutic strategies. Among white patients, those with prepubertal onset had low incidence and equal sex ratio; the incidence in females increased during and after puberty; males had lesser disease severity than females during and after puberty (p < 0.05); spontaneous remissions were most frequent (44%, p = 0.001) and persistence of active JMG for more than 10 years was least frequent (p = 0.05) in patients with prepubertal onset; remissions were more frequent after early than late thymectomy (p = 0.03); and final disease severity was less after early than late thymectomy. Black patients had similar incidence, disease severity, and sex ratio (F:M = 2:1) with pre-, peri-, or postpubertal disease onset; infrequent spontaneous or treatment-induced remissions; and the same final disease severity after early or late thymectomy. These observations imply that race and sex hormones modify the clinical features and outcome of JMG; spontaneous remissions are common in white patients with prepubertal disease onset; early thymectomy may be more beneficial than late thymectomy in white patients; and the role of thymectomy in the youngest patients is uncertain. We suggest that demographic factors should be considered when evaluating past and future therapeutic strategies for JMG.
Training neurosurgeons in ChinaIn their Correspondence, Norton and colleagues 1 remarked that neurosurgery should be an attractive option for the best medical students, regardless of gender, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status. However, this might not be the case in China. Because of the skills and knowledge that neurosurgical depart ments demand, recruitment of students is not easy. For example, in some institutions, neurosurgery students had a lower admission score than those in other clinical specialties, such as orthopaedics and cardiology. 2,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.