Tapered piles, which have greater top cross sections than bottom ones, have the potential for substantial cost advantages for static loading conditions. However, tapered piles have not often been considered a design option because of the lack of design tools and knowledge about the behaviour of these piles. The objectives of this study are to explore and better understand the operating characteristics of the axial response of tapered piles. A large laboratory facility for testing model piles was developed. In this facility, the soil was contained in a steel soil chamber and pressurized using an air bladder to model the confining pressure. Three instrumented steel piles with different degrees of taper were used in this study. As expected, it was found that as the taper angle increased, the shaft resistance increased. It was found that the shaft resistance of the tapered pile was up to 40% larger than that of the cylindrical pile. The difference in the shaft resistance of the two types decreased for higher values of confining pressure. It was also found that the load distribution along the pile shaft for both pile types had the same pattern. However, this pattern varied as the confining pressure increased. Furthermore, the unit load transfer was significantly affected by the initial sand density for both pile types at low confining pressure, but as the confining pressure increased, this effect diminished. It is concluded that the tapered piles offer a larger resistance than the cylindrical piles. However, for longer piles, it is suggested that the taper be limited to the top length corresponding to 20 diameters.Key words: tapered piles, shaft friction, axial response, load transfer, model testing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.