In this experimental work, the in uence of pile cross-section with varied con gurations on the axial compression load capacity of a single pile and related settlement in sand are investigated. The in uence of relative sand density (D r ), the pile length to diameter (L/D) ratios and the pile installation techniques are presented. A testing program comprising seven model steel piles with varied shapes of 20 mm width/diameter was conducted. The tests are performed on model piles with the pile length to diameter ratios of 10 and 30 installed in the three cases of sand modeling as loose, medium dense and dense sand. Results indicated that, the rectangular pile is the optimization cross-sectional under the same pile geometry and soil conditions. Also, the increase of the relative sand density has a signi cant in uence on the ultimate compression pile load. Furthermore, the ultimate axial loads of exible piles in the case of loose sand using the nondisplacement method were found to be increased by 119%, 114%, 143%, 82% 139%, 89% and 100% comparing with the ultimate axial loads of rigid piles for the seven models of closed-ended pipe, open-ended pipe, conical base pipe, square closed-ended, square openended, tapered and rectangular piles respectively. While, these percentages were found to be increased by (49%, 37%, 26%, 78%, 35%, 71% and 91%) and (77%, 50%, 13%, 116%, 61%, 89% and 85%) in the cases of medium dense and dense sand respectively. The results also indicated that, piles installed in sand using jacking technique have more resistance compared with piles installed in sand using nondisplacement technique.
