SummaryResetting of the epigenome in human primordial germ cells (hPGCs) is critical for development. We show that the transcriptional program of hPGCs is distinct from that in mice, with co-expression of somatic specifiers and naive pluripotency genes TFCP2L1 and KLF4. This unique gene regulatory network, established by SOX17 and BLIMP1, drives comprehensive germline DNA demethylation by repressing DNA methylation pathways and activating TET-mediated hydroxymethylation. Base-resolution methylome analysis reveals progressive DNA demethylation to basal levels in week 5–7 in vivo hPGCs. Concurrently, hPGCs undergo chromatin reorganization, X reactivation, and imprint erasure. Despite global hypomethylation, evolutionarily young and potentially hazardous retroelements, like SVA, remain methylated. Remarkably, some loci associated with metabolic and neurological disorders are also resistant to DNA demethylation, revealing potential for transgenerational epigenetic inheritance that may have phenotypic consequences. We provide comprehensive insight on early human germline transcriptional network and epigenetic reprogramming that subsequently impacts human development and disease.

Mouse primordial germ cells (PGC) undergo sequential epigenetic changes and genome-wide DNA demethylation to reset the epigenome for totipotency. Here, we demonstrate that erasure of CpG methylation (5mC) in PGCs occurs via conversion to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), driven by high levels of TET1 and TET2. Global conversion to 5hmC initiates asynchronously among PGCs at embryonic day (E) 9.5-E10.5 and accounts for the unique process of imprint erasure. Mechanistically, 5hmC enrichment is followed by its protracted decline thereafter at a rate consistent with replication-coupled dilution. The conversion to 5hmC is a significant component of parallel redundant systems that drive comprehensive reprogramming in PGCs. Nonetheless, we identify rare regulatory elements that escape systematic DNA demethylation in PGCs, providing a potential mechanistic basis for transgenerational epigenetic inheritance.Specification of primordial germ cells (PGCs) from epiblast cells at ~E6.25 is linked with extensive epigenetic reprogramming, including global DNA demethylation, chromatin reorganisation and imprint erasure, that is vital for generating totipotency (1, 2). The erasure of CpG methylation (5mC) is a key component of this program, but the dynamics and underlying mechanisms of the process remain unclear (3). Here we report a comprehensive analysis of PGCs by combining immunofluorescence, genome-wide (h)meDIP-seq, single cell RNA-seq, bisulfite-seq and functional analyses to address the mechanistic basis of epigenetic reprogramming in PGCs.We investigated Tet expression using single cell RNA-seq, which revealed that Tet1 and Tet2 are expressed in PGCs and peak between E10.5-E11.5, but that Tet3 is undetectable (Fig. 1A). Immunofluorescence (IF) showed that TET1 and TET2 are nuclear and expressed at significantly higher levels in PGCs than neighbouring somatic cells between E9.5-E11.5 (Fig. 1B & S1-S2). This suggests that erasure of 5mC in PGCs could occur through conversion to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) by TET1/TET2 (4, 5).We pursued this possibility by IF and found a progressive reduction of 5mC in PGCs between E9.5-E10.5, until it became undetectable by E11.5 (Fig. 1C). The loss of 5mC occurs concurrently with a global enrichment of 5hmC in PGCs between E9.5-E10.5, † To whom correspondence should be addressed. a.surani@gurdon.cam.ac.uk.

SummaryCell populations can be strikingly heterogeneous, composed of multiple cellular states, each exhibiting stochastic noise in its gene expression. A major challenge is to disentangle these two types of variability and to understand the dynamic processes and mechanisms that control them. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) provide an ideal model system to address this issue because they exhibit heterogeneous and dynamic expression of functionally important regulatory factors. We analyzed gene expression in individual ESCs using single-molecule RNA-FISH and quantitative time-lapse movies. These data discriminated stochastic switching between two coherent (correlated) gene expression states and burst-like transcriptional noise. We further showed that the “2i” signaling pathway inhibitors modulate both types of variation. Finally, we found that DNA methylation plays a key role in maintaining these metastable states. Together, these results show how ESC gene expression states and dynamics arise from a combination of intrinsic noise, coherent cellular states, and epigenetic regulation.

Pluripotency is the remarkable capacity of a single cell to engender all the specialized cell types of an adult organism. This property can be captured indefinitely through derivation of self-renewing embryonic stem cells (ESCs), which represent an invaluable platform to investigate cell fate decisions and disease. Recent advances have revealed that manipulation of distinct signaling cues can render ESCs in a uniform "ground state" of pluripotency, which more closely recapitulates the pluripotent naive epiblast. Here we discuss the extrinsic and intrinsic regulatory principles that underpin the nature of pluripotency and consider the emerging spectrum of pluripotent states.

SUMMARYMouse primordial germ cells (PGCs) erase global DNA methylation (5mC) as part of the comprehensive epigenetic reprogramming that occurs during PGC development. 5mC plays an important role in maintaining stable gene silencing and repression of transposable elements (TE) but it is not clear how the extensive loss of DNA methylation impacts on gene expression and TE repression in developing PGCs. Using a novel epigenetic disruption and recovery screen and genetic analyses, we identified a core set of germline-specific genes that are dependent exclusively on promoter DNA methylation for initiation and maintenance of developmental silencing. These gene promoters appear to possess a specialised chromatin environment that does not acquire any of the repressive H3K27me3, H3K9me2, H3K9me3 or H4K20me3 histone modifications when silenced by DNA methylation. Intriguingly, this methylation-dependent subset is highly enriched in genes with roles in suppressing TE activity in germ cells. We show that the mechanism for developmental regulation of the germline genome-defence genes involves DNMT3B-dependent de novo DNA methylation. These genes are then activated by lineage-specific promoter demethylation during distinct global epigenetic reprogramming events in migratory (~E8.5) and post-migratory (E10.5-11.5) PGCs. We propose that genes involved in genome defence are developmentally regulated primarily by promoter DNA methylation as a sensory mechanism that is coupled to the potential for TE activation during global 5mC erasure, thereby acting as a failsafe to ensure TE suppression and maintain genomic integrity in the germline.

DNA methylation is dynamically remodelled during the mammalian life cycle through distinct phases of reprogramming and de novo methylation. These events enable the acquisition of cellular potential followed by the maintenance of lineage-restricted cell identity, respectively, a process that defines the life cycle through successive generations. DNA methylation contributes to the epigenetic regulation of many key developmental processes including genomic imprinting, X-inactivation, genome stability and gene regulation. Emerging sequencing technologies have led to recent insights into the dynamic distribution of DNA methylation during development and the role of this epigenetic mark within distinct genomic contexts, such as at promoters, exons or imprinted control regions. Additionally, there is a better understanding of the mechanistic basis of DNA demethylation during epigenetic reprogramming in primordial germ cells and during pre-implantation development. Here, we discuss our current understanding of the developmental roles and dynamics of this key epigenetic system.

No abstract

DNA sequencing upstream of the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi pilV and rci genes previously identified in the ca. 118-kb major pathogenicity island (X.-L. Zhang, C. Morris, and J. Hackett, Gene 202:139-146, 1997) identified a further 10 pil genes apparently forming a pil operon. The product of the pilS gene, prePilS protein (a putative type IVB structural prepilin) was purified, and an anti-prePilS antiserum was raised in mice. Mutants of serovar Typhi either lacking the whole pil operon or with an insertion mutation in the pilS gene were constructed, as was a strain in which the pilN to pilV genes were driven by the tac promoter. The pil Earlier, it was reported that the major pathogenicity island of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, which is ca. 118 kb in size (11), contained pilV and rci genes, which were cloned and sequenced (22). The Rci gene product was shown to be a site-specific recombinase, active to invert DNA in the C-terminal region of the pilV gene, so that two PilV proteins could be synthesized. Comparisons with database sequences indicated that the two possible pilV genes might code for pilus-tip adhesins, as the serovar Typhi PilV sequence was similar to that of PilV proteins encoded by the Escherichia coli R64 plasmid. In R64-bearing strains, different PilV proteins, borne on type IV pili, select various recipients in liquid mating (the R64-bearing cell is the donor) (10). Both serovar Typhi PilV proteins were seen when the two pilV genes were transcribed from the T7 promoter. The discovery of the serovar Typhi pilV and rci genes in the ca. 118-kb pathogenicity island (henceforth in this work termed the large pathogenicity island) suggested that serovar Typhi might synthesize thin pili belonging to the type IV pilin family (9). As type IV pili, encoded in a Vibrio cholerae pathogenicity island (7, 8) are used by V. cholerae as mediators of adhesion to human cells (13, 18), it was of interest to ask (i) if serovar Typhi also synthesizes type IV pili and (ii) if such pili are important in adherence to or invasion of human intestinal cells. These topics are the subject of this paper. MATERIALS AND METHODSMaterials. All reagents were of molecular biology grade. Enzymes active on DNA were obtained from either GibcoBRL or Boehringer Mannheim and were used as directed by the suppliers. 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-␤-D-galactopyranoside and isopropyl-␤-D-thiogalactopyranoside were purchased from Amersham. Anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (from sheep), conjugated with horseradish peroxidase, was from Amersham. Phosphatase-labeled goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (heavy and light chains) was purchased from KPL Laboratories. p-Nitrophenyl phosphate tablets were from Sigma. Bio-Rad was the supplier of polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Freund's adjuvant was from GibcoBRL.Strains and vectors. Serovar Typhi J341 (Ty2 Vi Ϫ ) (22) was the source of DNA for a cosmid bank (partially Sau3AI-cut DNA in BamHI-cut pHC79), which was probed with 32 P-labeled total DNA (including the virulence plasmid pSLT) of (wild-type,...