All patients and caregivers need initial and ongoing screening for sleep/wake disturbances. When disturbed sleep/wakefulness is evident, further assessment and treatment are warranted. Nursing educational programs should include content regarding healthy and disrupted sleep/wake patterns. Research on sleep/wake disturbances in people with cancer should have high priority.
Clinicians need to be aware that older women receiving hormonal treatment for their breast cancer may experience fatigue, sleep disturbances, and depressive symptoms. Homebased walking activity may reduce symptom severity in this group.
Background
Patients with long-standing persistent (LSP) atrial fibrillation (AF) who have previously undergone catheter ablation represent a challenging patient population. Repeat catheter ablation in these patients is arduous and associated with a high failure rate, whereas surgical ablation can be complicated by multiple flutters. We sought to determine if minimally-invasive surgical ablation, followed by catheter ablation of all inducible flutters, would improve success rates over repeat catheter ablation alone.
Methods
Fifteen patients (Sequential) with persistent or LSP AF who failed at least one catheter ablation and one anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) underwent surgical ablation, followed by planned endocardial evaluation and catheter mapping with ablation during the same hospitalization. Sequential patients were matched to 30 patients who had previously failed at least one catheter ablation and underwent a repeat catheter ablation (catheter-alone). The primary end point was event-free survival of any documented AF recurrence or AAD use.
Results
All patients underwent uncomplicated surgical ablation and electrophysiology procedure. Five Sequential patients had seven inducible flutters that were mapped and ablated. After a mean follow-up of 20.7 ± 4.5 months, 13/15 (86.7%) Sequential patients, but only 16/30 (53.3%) catheter-alone patients, were free of any atrial arrhythmia and off of AAD (p = 0.04). On AAD, 14/15 (93.3%) Sequential patients were free of any atrial arrhythmia recurrence, compared to 17/30 (56.7%) catheter-alone patients (p = 0.01).
Conclusions
For patients with atrial fibrillation who have failed catheter ablation, Sequential minimally invasive epicardial surgical ablation, followed by endocardial catheter-based ablation, has a higher early success rate than repeat catheter ablation alone.
Data help to explain a mechanism that may underlie fatigue, sleep, and depressive symptoms and provide a theoretical framework from which to establish evidence-based interventions for symptom management.
Assessment of cancer treatment-related fatigue must be ongoing, even after treatment ends. Findings suggest an awareness of the importance of understanding fatigue mechanisms to enable future testing of research-based interventions.
Deferring percutaneous coronary intervention on the basis of nonischemic FFR in patients with an initial presentation of ACS is associated with significantly worse outcomes than SIHD. Caution is warranted in using FFR values derived from patients with SIHD for clinical decision making in ACS patients.
The proposed model will facilitate testing of interventions based on the premise that common neuroendocrine transmitters provide the mechanisms of fatigue in patients diagnosed with chronic illnesses, such as with cancer treatment-related fatigue. The model may also be used to identify predictors of fatigue in specific patient populations, provide guidance for clinicians in their selection of precise interventions to be implemented, and identify the effects of treatments captured in these populations. By clearly identifying the mechanisms of fatigue, we can discover which interventions are effective for particular types of fatigue.
A cognitive-behavioral intervention may be a useful adjunct or alternative to current hot flash treatments. Findings will be used to modify the intervention and data collection methods before undertaking a larger study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.