Introduction: Favorable responses in American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL) patients to treatment with 5 mg Sb v /kg/day meglumine antimoniate (MA) has been reported in Rio de Janeiro, but little is known regarding the therapeutic response to low doses in patients from other locations. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted to compare the therapeutic response to 5 mg Sb v /kg/day MA treatment among 36 patients who acquired ATL in Brazilian states other than Rio de Janeiro (OS group) and 72 patients from Rio de Janeiro (RJ group). Results: One course of 5 mg Sb v /kg/day MA cured 72.8% of 81 cutaneous (CL) and 66.6% of 27 mucosal (ML) leishmaniasis-infected patients: 70% in the CL/RJ group, 81% in the CL/OS group, 50% in the ML/RJ group, and 80% in the ML/OS group. After up to two additional treatment courses at the same dose, 88.9% and 85.2% of the CL and ML patients were cured, respectively. Adverse events were observed in 40% of patients in the CL/RJ group, 57% of the CL/OS group, 58% of the ML/RJ group, and 80% of the ML/OS group. No significant differences were observed in the cure rates or adverse effects between the RJ and OS groups. No patients required permanent discontinuation of treatment due to adverse events. Conclusions: Patients with ATL acquired in both RJ and OS may respond to low-dose MA. While high-dose MA should remain the standard treatment for ATL, low-dose MA might be preferred when toxicity is a primary concern.
These findings suggest a common source of infection for all patients and reinforce the hypotheses of spread of M. massiliense BRA100 in Brazilian hospital surgical environment in recent years.
The diagnosis of American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL) is based on the visualization or isolation of the parasite, which is a time-consuming and poorly sensitive method. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy and reliability of ELISA for the diagnosis of ATL using soluble (SF) and membrane-enriched (MF) antigen fractions obtained from an infectious strain of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis. A total of 152 serum samples investigated at a referral center in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between 2005 and 2007 were studied. Each sample was tested twice with each fraction for the calculation of reliability (intraclass coefficient (ICC)). Cut-off values of 0.22 (SF) and 0.33 (MF) were defined. The use of the fractions resulted in good discrimination between patients, with a large area under the curve (P<0.0001), but no difference was observed between the two fractions (P=0.45). Sensitivity was 89.5% for each fraction, specificity was 89.5% for SF and 93.4% for MF, and the positive likelihood ratio was 8.5 for SF and 13.6 for MF. The ICCs were excellent (SF: 0.96 and MF: 0.90). The antigens tested provided precision and accuracy for the diagnosis of ATL, with SF being recommended due to its lower cost and greater practicality.
The capacity of monoclonal anti-DNA antibodies, derived spontaneously from MRL-lpr/lpr mice, to bind directly to intrinsic glomerular antigens and form immune deposits was evaluated. Two antibodies, H130 (IgM-kappa) and H241 (IgG2a-kappa), bound to normal glomeruli in vitro. This binding was not inhibited by DNAase, but it was, in the case of H130, inhibited by the anti-idiotype anti-H130. Both antibodies also bound to glomerular digests on nitrocellulose. After i.v. injection, however, H241 bound to glomeruli and formed glomerular immune deposits, whereas H130 did not. Similarly, after i.p. injection of H241 hybridomas to normal mice, all mice developed glomerular immune deposits. In contrast, administration of H130 hybridomas, other anti-DNA-producing hybridomas, and other unrelated hybridomas did not lead to glomerular immune deposit formation. We conclude that certain lupus auto-antibodies can form glomerular immune deposits by binding directly to non-DNA antigenic structures that are normally present in extracellular locations within normal glomeruli.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.