No abstract

Although a contribution of sex in opioid efficacy has garnered much attention, the confirmation and direction of any such difference remain elusive. We performed a systematic review of the available literature on sex differences in μ and mixed μ/κ opioid effect on acute and experimental pain. Fifty unique studies (including three unpublished studies) were included in the analyses. Across the 25 clinical studies on μ-opioids there was no significant sex-analgesia association. Restricting the analysis to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) studies (irrespective of the opioid) yielded greater analgesia in women (n=15, effect size 0.22, 95% c.i. 0.02-0.42, P=0.028). Further restricting the analysis to PCA morphine studies yielded an even greater effect in women (n=11, effect size=0.36, 95% c.i. 0.17-0.56, P=0.003). Meta-regression indicated that the longer the duration of PCA, the difference in effect between the sexes further increased. Across experimental pain studies on μ-opioids women had greater antinociception from opioids (n=11, effect size=0.35; 95% c.i. 0.01-0.69, P=0.047), which was predominantly due to 6 morphine studies. Female patients had greater μ/κ opioid analgesia (n=7, effect size 0.84; 95% c.i. 0.25-1.43, P=0.005), but no sex-analgesia association was present in experimental studies (n=7). Sex differences exist in morphine-induced analgesia in both experimental pain studies and clinical PCA studies, with greater morphine efficacy in women. The data on non-morphine μ and mixed μ/κ-opioids are less convincing and require further study.

The purpose of this review is to illustrate the utility and value of employing human self-administration procedures in medication development, including abuse liability assessments of novel medications and evaluation of potential pharmacotherapies for substance use disorders. Traditionally, human abuse liability testing has relied primarily on subjective reports describing drug action by use of questionnaires; similarly, drug interactions between putative treatment agents and the drugs of abuse have relied on these measures. Subjective reports are highly valued because they provide qualitative and quantitative information about the characteristics of central and peripheral pharmacodynamic effects as well as safety and tolerability. However, self-administration procedures directly examine the behavior of interest -that is, drug taking. The present paper 1) reviews the most commonly used human self-administration procedures, 2) discusses the concordance of subjective reports and selfadministration within the context of medications development for substance use disorders, focusing primarily on illustrative examples from development efforts with opioid and cocaine dependence, and 3) explores the utility of applying self-administration procedures to assess the abuse liability of novel compounds, including "abuse deterrent" formulations (ADFs). The review will focus on opioid and cocaine dependence because a rich database from both clinical laboratory and clinical trial research exists for these two drug classes. The data reviewed suggest that drug-induced changes in self-administration and subjective effects are not always concordant. Therefore, assessment of selfadministration in combination with subjective effects provides a more comprehensive picture that may have improved predictive validity for translating to the clinical setting.

The literature on the effects of opioids on psychomotor and cognitive functioning in humans is evaluated. Some studies have examined the acute and chronic effects of various opioids on different subject populations. In addition, epidemiologic studies have examined the neuropsychological functioning and the risk of accidents for persons who have (or have had) opioids in their systemic circulation. In general, it appears that some opioids (mixed agonist–antagonists) more than others (morphine or codeine) impair psychomotor and cognitive functioning in healthy volunteers who have no history of opioid abuse. However, perhaps because of tolerance mechanisms, those who use opioids occasionally or habitually (patients with chronic pain or opioid abusers) are much less likely to have impairment of psychomotor or cognitive processes by opioids. Past research and present gaps in knowledge are used to make recommendations regarding worthwhile future directions in research.

Oxycodone produced effects similar to those of other mu opioid agonists. Although oxycodone produced abuse liability-related subjective effects, it also produced unpleasant effects, a phenomenon we have observed in other opioid studies in non-drug-abusing volunteers.