No abstract

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues.Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. b s t r a c tResults reported here highlight the potential and several challenges in the development of a novel osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) process for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Following the initial gradual decline, a stable permeate flux value was obtained after approximately four days of continuous operation. There was evidence of continuous deterioration of biological activity of the OMBR system, possibly due to the build-up of salinity in the reactor. The removal of 25 out of 27 trace organic compounds with molecular weight higher than 266 g/mol was above 80% and was possibly governed by the interplay between physical separation of the FO membrane and biodegradation. In contrast, the removal efficiency values of the other 23 trace organic compounds with molecular weight less than 266 g/mol were very scattered. The removal efficiency of these low molecular weight compounds by OMBR treatment appears to depend mostly on biological degradation. Crown

No abstract

No abstract

The rejection of trace organic contaminants (TrOCs) by an osmotically driven membrane filtration process was investigated. A set of 40 compounds representing major groups of TrOCs of concern was selected for this study. The rejection of the TrOCs by a commercial cellulose acetate asymmetric forward osmosis membrane, as well as a ''tight'' commercial thin-film composite nanofiltration (NF) membrane, was systematically investigated and compared under three different operating modes: forward osmosis (FO), pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) and reverse osmosis (RO). Results revealed that the cellulose acetate membrane had considerably smaller water and salt permeabilities as well as less negative surface charge compared to the NF membrane. However, the cellulose acetate membrane resulted in considerably higher water flux than the NF when operated in FO and PRO modes. Nevertheless, the NF membrane displayed consistently better TrOC rejection than the HTI membrane. In RO mode, electrostatic interactions played a dominant role in governing the rejection of charged TrOCs. In FO and PRO modes, the rejection of charged TrOCs was governed by both electrostatic interaction and size exclusion, while rejection of neutral compounds was dominated by size exclusion, with rejection increasing with TrOC molecular weight. Operating in PRO mode resulted in a higher water flux but a notably lower TrOC rejection as compared with FO mode, because of more severe internal concentration polarization (ICP) phenomenon. Another important observation from this study is that rejection of neutral TrOCs in FO mode was higher than that in RO mode. This could be attributed to the retarded forward diffusion of TrOCs resulting from reverse salt flux of the NaCl draw solution, a phenomenon that takes place in FO mode but is not possible in RO mode.

No abstract

No abstract

This study aims to develop a predictive framework to assess the removal and fate of trace organic chemicals (TrOCs) during wastewater treatment by anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR). The fate of 27 TrOCs in both the liquid and sludge phases during AnMBR treatment was systematically investigated. The results demonstrate a relationship between hydrophobicity and specific molecular features of TrOCs and their removal efficiency. These molecular features include the presence of electron withdrawing groups (EWGs) or donating groups (EDGs), especially those containing nitrogen and sulphur. All seven hydrophobic contaminants were well removed (>70%) by AnMBR treatment. Most hydrophilic TrOCs containing EDGs were also well removed (>70%). In contrast, hydrophilic TrOCs containing EWGs were mostly poorly removed and could accumulate in the sludge phase. The removal of several nitrogen/sulphur bearing TrOCs (e.g., linuron and caffeine) by AnMBR was higher than that by aerobic treatment, possibly due to nitrogen or sulphur reducing bacteria. Disciplines Engineering | Science and Technology Studies