Development of a predictive framework to assess the removal of trace organic chemicals by anaerobic membrane bioreactor

Abstract

This study aims to develop a predictive framework to assess the removal and fate of trace organic chemicals (TrOCs) during wastewater treatment by anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR). The fate of 27 TrOCs in both the liquid and sludge phases during AnMBR treatment was systematically investigated. The results demonstrate a relationship between hydrophobicity and specific molecular features of TrOCs and their removal efficiency. These molecular features include the presence of electron withdrawing groups (EWGs) or donating groups (EDGs), especially those containing nitrogen and sulphur. All seven hydrophobic contaminants were well removed (>70%) by AnMBR treatment. Most hydrophilic TrOCs containing EDGs were also well removed (>70%). In contrast, hydrophilic TrOCs containing EWGs were mostly poorly removed and could accumulate in the sludge phase. The removal of several nitrogen/sulphur bearing TrOCs (e.g., linuron and caffeine) by AnMBR was higher than that by aerobic treatment, possibly due to nitrogen or sulphur reducing bacteria. Disciplines Engineering | Science and Technology Studies

Effects of sulphur on the performance of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor: Biological stability, trace organic contaminant removal, and membrane fouling

“…tubing) of the experimental system. Indeed, low bisphenol A removal by anaerobic treatment has also been reported in several previous lab-cale studies (Monsalvo et al, 2014;Wijekoon et al, 2015).…”

Organic micropollutants in aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors: Changes in microbial communities and gene expression

“…The increase of the alkaliphilic A. saponilacus further elucidates the potential role of alkaliphilic bacteria in the biodegradation of OMPs previously discussed for the aerobic system, especially considering that all of the compounds determined to be highly biodegradable in the anaerobic system had pKa values of greater than 5 (Wei et al, 2015a). These variations in the fermentative bacterial community and their relation to OMP presence in the wastewater were seen although sulfate reducers, nitrate reducers, and methanogens are regarded as the main anaerobic microbial groups responsible for trace organic compound removal (Wijekoon et al, 2015).…”

“…Generally, these studies found that removal rates of OMPs were significantly affected by treatment plant operating conditions and that, overall, aerobic MBR systems were more efficient than CAS in the removal of OMPs. The issue of OMPs in anaerobic MBRs has only recently developed as a topic of interest and will become increasingly important as anaerobic MBR technology evolves as a suitable municipal wastewater treatment option (Monsalvo et al, 2014;Wijekoon et al, 2015).…”

Assessing the removal of organic micro-pollutants from anaerobic membrane bioreactor effluent by fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis

“…Recent studies on the efficiency of OMPs removal in the AnMBR process indicated that bio-transformation is the dominant OMPs removal mechanism [10] and there is a correlation between hydrophobicity, specific molecular features (i.e., electron withdrawing groups (EWGs) and electron donating groups (EDGs)) and OMPs removal efficiency [11].…”