No abstract

Since their initial description in 1957, the interferons (IFNs) have been increasingly used to treat a wide array of diseases. Acute adverse effects, i.e. 'flu-like' syndromes, hypo- or hypertension, tachycardia, headache, myalgias and gastrointestinal disorders, occur within the first hour or day after starting treatment. They are seldom treatment-limiting and are easily manageable. Sub-acute and chronic effects develop after several days, usually within 2 and 4 weeks of therapy. The most typical is neurological toxicity, including fatigue/asthenia, and behavioural and cognitive changes. Such symptoms may seriously impair quality of life and result in treatment discontinuation. Seizures have seldom been described. Other infrequent central nervous system adverse effects include vertigo, cramp and oculomotor nerve paralysis. Distal paraesthesias and peripheral neuropathy have been reported. IFN-associated autoimmunity is quite rare but a matter of concern. Biological or clinical manifestations usually require several months to become apparent. Autoantibodies have been shown to develop in most patients but have been inconsistently associated with clinical symptoms of systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid-like arthritis and thyroiditis. Both hypo- and hyperthyroidism have been described but are usually reversible. Other infrequent autoimmune reactions include diabetes, pemphigus and worsening of multiple sclerosis. Although several patients present with a pre-existing autoimmune disorder, no predisposing factor has been clearly established. While hypotension and tachycardia are the most frequent acute cardiovascular complications, a few additional cases of cardiac arrhythmias and myocardial ischaemia have been reported after a short course or several weeks of treatment. These latter complications do not appear to be dose-dependent or age-related. Isolated cases of congestive heart failure have also been described. Mild proteinuria has been observed in 15 to 25% of patients, but acute renal toxicity is uncommon. A transient rise in serum aminotransferase levels is frequently noted during the first stage of therapy, especially in patients receiving the highest dosages. Direct hepatotoxicity is extremely rare. Autoimmune hepatitis, which is ill-diagnosed as chronic viral hepatitis, and de novo induction of autoimmune hepatitis, account for the majority of liver diseases. Haematotoxicity is relatively common but mild to moderate, and develops gradually during the first weeks of treatment. Neutropenia is the most common haematological toxicity, but is usually not dose-limiting and resolves rapidly upon drug discontinuation. Myelosuppression, autoimmune and immune allergic haemolytic anaemias and thrombocytopenias have seldom been described. Cutaneous adverse effects comprised nonspecific erythema and hair loss and, less frequently, vasculitis, local ulcerations at the site of injection and exacerbation of psoriasis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are large molecules intended to bind to specific targets often expressed on the immune system, and to treat various immunopathological conditions. Therefore, mAbs can be considered to have a high potential for immunotoxicity, which is reflected in the clinical experience accumulated on mAbs-induced adverse effects related to immunosuppression, immunostimulation and hypersensitivity (immunogenicity). So far, non clinical immunotoxicity studies have been inadequate to address all safety issues in relation to the possible immunotoxicity of mAbs, because they are fraught with limitations and pitfalls primarily related to the lack of relevant animal species. In addition, clinical studies rarely include validated end-points dedicated to the prediction of immunotoxicity. With the ongoing development of mAbs as novel therapeutic strategies for a wide variety of diseases, efforts should be paid to improve our understanding of mAbs-induced immunotoxic effects and design dedicated strategies to assess their immunological safety, both non clinically and clinically.

Antimicrobial sulfonamides were the first antimicrobial agents used effectively to treat infectious diseases. However, because they may cause severe adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and because more effective agents have since been developed, sulfonamides now are used for only a few indications in specific groups, such as AIDS patients. Skin reactions, from benign rash to potentially lethal toxidermias, are the most frequent ADRs to sulfonamides. Other major ADRs include acute liver injury, pulmonary reactions, and blood dyscrasias. Although the mechanisms involved have not been fully elucidated, reactive metabolites appear to play a pivotal role. The hydroxylamine and nitroso metabolites of sulfamethoxazole, the most frequently used sulfonamide today, can bind covalently to proteins because of their chemical reactivity, resulting in the induction of specific adverse immune responses. Therefore, changes in the activity of metabolic and detoxification pathways are associated with a greater risk for developing allergic reactions to sulfonamides. Allergies to sulfonamides, particularly sulfamethoxazole (often used in combination with trimethoprim as co-trimoxazole), are more frequent in AIDS patients, but the reason for this increased risk is not fully understood. No valid tools are available to predict which patients have a greater risk for developing allergies to sulfonamides. Diagnosis is essential to avoid a possible evolution toward severe reactions and readministration of the offending drug. In patients who absolutely require further treatment, successful desensitization may be achieved.

A number of cytokines are used as haemopoietic growth factors and this review focuses on toxicities associated with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), interleukin (IL)-1, IL-3, IL-4, IL-6 and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF). Both GM-CSF and G-CSF, currently approved for clinical use, are generally well tolerated by the majority of patients during short term administration. Constitutional symptoms and bone pain are the most frequently reported adverse effects, but they are rarely treatment-limiting. Reactivation of rheumatoid symptoms, and exacerbation of autoimmune thyroiditis or autoimmune haematological disorders have sometimes been described. Severe cardiovascular complications include the possibility for arterial thromboses and the vascular leak syndrome, which is more specifically observed with GM-CSF. Reports of several cases and small series of patients have suggested that growth factors might increase the pulmonary toxicity of chemotherapy, a possibility that remains debated and requires further attention. Generalised or local cutaneous reactions are frequently noted with GM-CSF. Leukocytoclastic vasculitis was observed with both growth factors, while neutrophilic dermatoses have been mostly described with G-CSF. Exacerbation of psoriasis and isolated anaphylactic reactions have appeared with GM-CSF and G-CSF. The hepatotoxic potential of the growth factors is not clearly established, but the occurrence of coagulation abnormalities has recently been reported. Renal and biological disturbances are usually transient. Long term treatment with GM-CSF and G-CSF also seems to be well tolerated, but the possible occurrence of several adverse events, i.e. bone disorders, leukaemia, unmasking or acceleration of underlying disease, require further investigation in patients receiving prolonged treatment, as in myelodysplasia. Finally, antibodies against growth factors have been reported only with GM-CSF. Other cytokines are still under investigation. Flu-like and constitutional symptoms, sometimes dose-limiting, have been reported with IL-1, IL-3, IL-4 and IL-6, while M-CSF was occasionally associated with such adverse effects. More specific adverse events, also frequently considered as dose-limiting toxicities, include hypotension with IL-1, severe headache or skin rash with IL-3, and nasal congestion and gastroduodenal lesions with IL-4. Severe capillary leak syndrome has been reported only with IL-4. M-CSF toxicity is minimal and limited to reversible but sometimes dose-limiting thrombocytopenia and ophthalmological symptoms with the recombinant product. Again, the safety of long term administration of these cytokines has not yet been determined, and IL-3-induced disease progression in myelodysplastic patients has been suggested.

No abstract

Because of the wide use of pesticides for domestic and industrial purposes, the evaluation of their immunotoxic effects is of major concern for public health. Despite the large amount of experimental data describing pesticide-induced immunosuppression, evidence that pesticides may severely impair immune functions in humans is lacking or scarce. Contact hypersensitivity is a well-identified immunotoxic effect of pesticides but remains a rare complaint in pesticide-exposed workers. By contrast, immunologically mediated systemic reactions have been described only as debatable case reports. The association between autoimmune diseases and pesticide exposure has more recently been suggested. Despite the lack of convincing human data, a potential risk for the immune system should not be excluded, especially during chronic exposure to pesticides or in otherwise (immuno) compromised patients (malnutrition, children, old patients). Epidemiological studies including markers of exposure and the assessment of immune competence in exposed individuals, or registries of sentinel diseases related to immunosuppression (e.g., non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, opportunistic infections) or autoimmunity (e.g. lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis), are warranted.

No abstract