The QLQ-H&N35, in conjunction with the QLQ-C30, provides a valuable tool for the assessment of health-related quality of life in clinical studies of H&N cancer patients before, during, and after treatment with radiotherapy, surgery, or chemotherapy.
Objectives: To describe prospectively the longterm changes of quality of life and mood in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy. Patients and Methods: One hundred seven patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Questionnaire, the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Module, and the Cent er for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale before treatment, and 6, 12, 24, and 36 months later.Results: There was limited deterioration of physical and role functioning and of many head and neck symptoms at 6 months, with improvement thereafter. After 36 months only physical functioning, taste/ smell, dry mouth, and sticky saliva were significantly worse, compared with baseline. Female sex, higher cancer stage, and combination treatment were associated with more symptoms and worse functioning. Despite physical deterioration, there was a gradual improvement of depressive symptomatology and global quality of life. Conclusion: Treatment for head and neck cancer results in short-term morbidity, most of which resolves within 1 year. Despite an initially high level of depressive symptomatology, there is gradual improvement of p sychological functioning and global quality of life over the course of 3 years. In this prospective study, the impact of the disease and its treatment in long-term survivors seems to be less severe than it is often assumed to be. Key Words: Quality of life, head and neck cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, depression.
Barriers and facilitators of CRC screening participation are frequently reported. Understanding these factors is the first step to possibly modify specific factors to increase CRC screening participation rate.
Overall quality of life and psychological well-being did not change in ICD recipients, irrespective of whether they experienced defibrillatory shocks. The high prevalence of depression and anxiety can be interpreted as a response to the perceived physical and mental problems regarding daily activities. Our data indicate that patients who have experienced an ICD shock do not adapt well to living with an ICD, they are more anxious than ICD recipients who received no shocks. However, the anticipation of having another shock after experiencing one is less stressful than that of the first shock. We conclude that the lasting psychological distress will not dissipate spontaneously or naturally and that psychosocial interventions may be warranted.
Elderly patients with head and neck cancer are less likely to receive standard treatment. This study assessed the influence that age, tumour characteristics, comorbidity, social support, depressive symptoms and quality of life have on treatment choice. One hundred and five patients between 45 and 60 years of age and 78 patients of > or =70 years of age with carcinoma of the oral cavity (stage > or =II), oro- and hypopharynx (stage > or =II) or larynx (stage > or =III) completed a questionnaire on quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and H&N35), depressive symptoms (CES-D) and social support (RSS12-I). In the 45-60 age group, 89% received standard treatment, compared with 62% of the > or =70 age group. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the following factors predicted non-standard treatment: marital status (widowed), advanced tumour stage, comorbidity, less pain, considering the length of life less important than its quality and old age. This study showed that age itself independently influences treatment choice. However, it should be emphasised that the choice of a treatment should be based on a medical assessment and the patient's preferences, not on chronological age.
We found these subscales to be reliable and of clinical use. It is recommended to use the revised UDI and IIQ in outcome analysis of treatments for urogenital symptoms in women.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.