No abstract

No abstract

1. In three successive trials with cockerels and mature ostrich males the apparent and true metabolisable energy values, corrected for nitrogen retention (AMEn and TMEn) were determined by a balance method for malting barley, oats, triticale and yellow maize. All these ingredients were used as sole dietary components with the exception of triticale for ostriches which was diluted with 440 g/kg lucerne meal. The balance trial lasted for 5 d after an adaption period of 7 d for ostriches, and 3 d after an adaption period of one day for cockerels. 2. AMEn values for cockerels of malting barley, oats, triticale and maize were 11.6, 10.48, 11.44 and 14.42 MJ/kg respectively. Significantly higher values of 14.21, 12.65, 12.60 and 14.89 MJ/kg were determined for malting barley, oats, triticale and maize for ostriches. 3. TMEn values determined by regression yielded values in ostriches of 13.92, 12.27, 13.21 and 15.22 MJ/kg for malting barley, oats, triticale and maize respectively. The corresponding TMEn values in cockerels were 11.33, 10.63, 11.82 and 14.07 MJ/kg. 4. The ostrich is capable of utilising fibre more efficiently than poultry. The higher energy values observed for the various ingredients also indicated that the non-starch polysaccharides such as beta-glucans and arabinoxylans in the more fibrous energy sources had little if any effect on the available energy of these ingredients as found with poultry. 5. The potential of ostriches to utilise the more fibrous energy sources like barley, oats and triticale allows for their economical use in diet formulation. This possibility may result in markedly lower food costs for ostriches.

In an experiment involving 30 roosters and 15 mature male ostriches the apparent metabolizable energy (ME) values, corrected for zero nitrogen retention (AMEn), were determined by balance method for maize and lucerne meal. A group of 10 roosters received maize as the sole dietary component. For the second group of 10 roosters a blend of 750 g/kg maize and 250 g/kg lucerne was prepared. The diet of the third group consisted of 500 g/kg maize and 500 g/kg lucerne meal. The ostrich basal diet consisted of 1000 g/kg lucerne, and was blended in the ratios 50 lucerne: 50 maize and 25 lucerne: 75 maize. Each dietary treatment was given to five ostriches, individually housed in metabolism crates. Food intake and excreta collection was carried out over a period of 5 days after the ostriches had been accustomed to the diets for 7 days. For roosters food intake and excreta collection lasted for 72 h after an adaptation period of 24 h.The AMEn value for maize was 14·49 (s.e. 0·046) MJ/kg in roosters while in ostriches AME,, values of 14·3 (s.e. 1·81) and 14·5 (s.e. 0·845) MJ/kg for the 500 g/kg inclusion and 250 g/kg inclusion respectively were found.In roosters lucerne meal yielded AME,, values of 4·49 (s.e. 0·506) and 4·05 (s.e. 0·321) at 250 g/kg and 500 g/kg inclusion levels respectively. For the ostriches a value of 8·9 (s.e. 0·755) Mj/kg was found for lucerne.True ME, corrected for zero nitrogen retention, (TMEJ was computed by regressing gross energy output on gross energy input over all feeding levels. Maize yielded values of 14·65 (s.e. 0·0455) and 14·9 (s.e. 0·351) for roosters and ostriches respectively while corresponding values for lucerne were 4·03 (s.e. 0·118) and 8·6 (s.e. 0·296) MJ/kg.It was concluded that the ostriches were capable of digesting a high starch diet such as maize to the same extent as adult roosters but ostriches were capable of digesting a high fibre ingredient such as lucerne meal much more efficiently.

1. Four different methods (dual semi-quick (DSQ), conventional, a true metabolisable energy (ATM) method and Farrell's rapid method) were used to measure in adult roosters the apparent metabolisable energy (AME) and true metabolisable energy (TME) of four maize-based diets with bran inclusions of 0, 200, 400 and 600 g/kg 2. Daily food intakes per bird were 75 g (or ad libitum) (H), 35 g (M) and 10 g (L). AME values determined by DSQ, conventional and Farrell methods were not different at the two highest intakes but were depressed at L intakes. ATM method often gave different values from other methods, particularly at the lowest intake. 3. The linear relationships between food intake and excreta energy yielded intercept values of 13 to 32 kJ/d for three methods; but ATM method yielded intercepts of 31 to 52 kJ/d. In a separate experiment it was demonstrated that a linear model may not be the most appropriate fit to such data. Removal of data for the 10 g/d intake yielded linear regression equations with intercepts not significantly different from zero for the two continuous feeding methods (i.e. a zero estimate for endogenous urinary and metabolic faecal energy (EEL), but for the two methods using a single input after fasting, intercepts were almost always positive. This confirms Härtel's (1986) observation of the absence of EEL under continuous feeding but its ever presence using a TME assay. 4. Correction of AME for EEL to obtain TME tended to increase values for all diets and also within a diet with decreasing intakes. The effect of correcting AME to nitrogen balance (n) was to give AME n values that were more consistent between diets and reduced differences between methods. For the conventional method differences between the three intakes on all diets were greatly reduced. 483 Downloaded by [] at 00:03 05 February 2015 484 D. J. FARRELL ETAL.5. There is reason to be concerned about the many different metabolisable energy values obtained using the ATM method compared to the three other methods and the basis for correcting for endogenous excreta. It is concluded that because of the uncertainty of EEL values, their variation and application, the AME system should be retained.