Working memory is a complex cognitive component responsible for maintenance of information during processing. Interpreting research has so far focused on working memory capacity rather than on the central executive functions. In the study described here, 28 professional interpreters completed a battery of four central executive tasks and three simultaneous interpretations (from English into Czech or Dutch ‘A’). The results show that: (a) certain measurable features of simultaneous interpreting are related to the central executive functions of working memory; (b) one working memory function (inhibition of distractors) seems to be related to interpreting experience, while the others (automatic response inhibition, updating, attention switching) do not; (c) the relationship between working memory and simultaneous interpreting is such that different working memory functions predict different sub-processes in simultaneous interpreting, in complex patterns. The conclusions of this study are data-driven, but in line with the current literature. More specifically, the findings support those accounts of simultaneous interpreting which emphasize attentional control as an important component of the simultaneous interpreting process
Working memory is considered to be a crucial cognitive mechanism for the simultaneous interpreting process, but this assumption has not been substantially supported empirically. Previous research has mostly investigated working memory capacity differences between interpreters and non-interpreters. Little work has been done on relating working memory capacity directly to interpreting performance. The aim of the present exploratory correlational study was to test whether a relationship exists between working memory capacity and simultaneous interpreting performance measures in a sample of professional interpreters. Twenty-eight professional interpreters, aged 25-55, were tested on their working memory capacity (letter span, Corsi task, complex span) and on several measures of interpreting performance (lexical, semantic and syntactic processing, temporal delay, vocabulary richness and dealing with speed). Additionally, measures of general cognitive ability, age and interpreting experience were considered. There are two main findings. First, working memory performance in this sample shows predictable patterns in the structure of interpreters' working memory: there was a dissociation between verbal and spatial memory, and a negative relationship between age on the one hand and working memory measures and general cognitive ability on the other. This negative relationship provides evidence which is difficult to reconcile with the hypothesis of superior working memory in interpreters, as tested by previous research. Secondly, working memory measures were only marginally significantly related to simultaneous interpreting measures, and then only to those which have a predictable high memory component, i.e. lexical processing consisting of interpretation of isolated lexical items, such as figures and lists of nouns. The results suggest that working memory capacity, where the focus is on the memory component of working memory, may not be as important for professional simultaneous interpreting as previously thought. Working memory is probably the single most often researched isolated cognitive component in interpreting studies. The primary theoretical starting point has been the multimodal working memory model by Baddeley and Hitch (1974), although more recent work considers other models, too. More specifically, Cowan's (1988) model of activated long-term memory (Mizuno, 2005) and Ericsson and Kintsch's (1995) long-term working memory models (Pöchhacker, 2004) were suggested as being useful in the context of interpreting. Additionally, the role of working memory was modelled in several models of the interpreting process (for a review of general cognitive and interpreting-specific working
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.