In this article, a performance-based seismic design (PBD) methodology is proposed for the design of reinforced concrete buildings, taking into account the influence of infill walls. Two variants of the PBD framework are examined: The first is based on the non-linear static analysis procedure (NSP) while the second relies on the non-linear dynamic analysis procedure (NDP). Both design approaches are compared in the context of structural optimization with reference to the best possible design achieved for each case examined. Life-cycle cost analysis is considered a reliable tool for assessing the performance of structural systems and it is employed in this study for assessing the optimum designs obtained. The optimization part of the problem is performed with an Evolutionary Algorithm while three performance objectives are implemented in all formulations of the design procedures. The two most important findings can be summarized as follows: (i) if structural realization follows the design assumptions, then total expected life-cycle cost of the three type of structures, bare, fully infilled and open ground story, is almost the same and (ii) if an open ground story building is designed as bare or as fully infilled frame, real performance will be much worse than anticipated at the design stage.
The preservation of cultural heritage structures includes, among others, an efficient fire protection design process. This engineering design process frequently generates critical decision making issues related to conflicts that involve the buildings’ authenticity preservation, the implementation of special fire protection measures and addressing the particular needs of such structures. However, conventional approaches based on prescriptive regulations are often problematic in such cases; on the contrary, Performance-Based (PB) approaches could successfully deal with such structures to deliver designs that satisfy an acceptable fire safety level, and at the same time minimize the cost and any interventions on the building’s appearance, to the extent that authenticity is a key demand. Thus, in this study the upgrade of the fire safety level of cultural heritage structures is expressed as a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) problem. Accordingly, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is incorporated into a new fire protection Selection and Resource (S&R) allocation model, aiming to assess both fire safety and authenticity preservation levels with reference to the protection measures selected. Furthermore, in this study two different multi-criteria optimization approaches are applied to generate optimized solutions of the fire safety upgrading scheme. In this first part of the study, the theoretical basis of the proposed S&R allocation model that relies on a MCDM problem and how to deal with is discussed, while in the second part the implementation of the proposed model is presented for two real-world test cases. More specifically, in this study the theoretical part of the multi-objective and the multi-disciplinary problems (belonging to the MCDM type of problems) is provided with respect to the problems’ description and the methods adopted for solving the corresponding problems.
Fire protection for cultural heritage structures is a challenging engineering task that could benefit from the use of specialized computational tools relying on a performance-based design (PBD) concept rather than on prescriptive-based fire protection codes. In the first part of the present study, the theoretical basis of the proposed computational selection and resource (S and R) allocation model is discussed, related to the assessment of the fire safety index (FSI) and the authenticity preservation index (API). Furthermore, two different multi criteria optimization approaches are proposed to generate optimized fire protection upgrading designs, incorporating the nondominated sorting evolution strategies II (NSES-II) algorithm and the analytic target cascading (ATC) method. In this second part of the present work, the proposed S and R allocation model is implemented in two test cases; Villa Bianca, a famous mansion in Thessaloniki, Greece, and the Monastery of Simonos Petra located in Mount Athos, Greece. Several cases are examined regarding the targeted FSI or API values, taking also into account budget restrictions. In cases where the preservation of the authenticity is considered as an objective within the design process, the need to implement more sophisticated and customized fire protection measures can lead to a significant increase up to almost 200% regarding the total cost, subject to the pursued safety level. Detailed results obtained for each case study are presented and discussed comparatively, demonstrating the efficiency of the proposed S and R allocation model in a wide range of scenarios, as well as its possible utility in multiple applications, facilitating the fire protection design process. Finally, a comparison between the two multi criteria optimization approaches incorporated in the study is also presented and discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.