2009
DOI: 10.1080/13632460902988976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Masonry Infill Walls in the Framework of the Performance-Based Design

Abstract: In this article, a performance-based seismic design (PBD) methodology is proposed for the design of reinforced concrete buildings, taking into account the influence of infill walls. Two variants of the PBD framework are examined: The first is based on the non-linear static analysis procedure (NSP) while the second relies on the non-linear dynamic analysis procedure (NDP). Both design approaches are compared in the context of structural optimization with reference to the best possible design achieved for each c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the seismic induced damage for traditional buildings, PBSD are found useful for special structures, such as tall buildings, wall systems, masonry infill walls, and cultural heritage structures. Various applications in this area [121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138] are summarized in Table A9. Harries and McNeice [121] pointed out that the traditional strength-based design method is not capable of dealing with a large class of coupled core wall systems, since the method does not incorporate preferred yielding mechanism.…”
Section: Building Earthquake-based Design (Special Structures)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the seismic induced damage for traditional buildings, PBSD are found useful for special structures, such as tall buildings, wall systems, masonry infill walls, and cultural heritage structures. Various applications in this area [121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138] are summarized in Table A9. Harries and McNeice [121] pointed out that the traditional strength-based design method is not capable of dealing with a large class of coupled core wall systems, since the method does not incorporate preferred yielding mechanism.…”
Section: Building Earthquake-based Design (Special Structures)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lagaros et al . () proposed a PBD methodology for the design of RC buildings, taking into account the influence of infill walls, while two variants of the PBD framework are examined relying either on the nonlinear static or on the nonlinear dynamic analysis procedure. Kaveh et al .…”
Section: Literature Survey On Pbd Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masonry panels are commonly schematized through equivalent nonlinear inclined struts, which represent a good compromise between accuracy and simplicity (i.e. [9][10][11][12]). The most of the studies available on this topic in the literature are however mainly focused on infilled RC frames, while the effect of masonry panels in case of framed buildings with an inner RC core has been less investigated so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%