RDAVR facilitates reduced aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times compared with standard AVR, particularly in patients undergoing concomitant procedures, allowing the use of larger prostheses and resulting in lower transvalvular gradients and higher indexed effective orifice area compared with standard AVR. Therefore, RDAVR may help to overcome patient-prosthesis mismatch in some patients.

RD-AVR is a safe and simple procedure resulting in favourable short aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times and considerable low gradients in postoperative echocardiography. PPM following isolated RD-AVR remains in the range of standard aortic valve replacement. However, patients undergoing concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting, particularly of the circumflex artery, face a 3-fold increased risk for PPM implantation enhanced if right branch bundle block is present. Follow-up examination is necessary to determine whether these patients remain pacer dependent during long-term follow-up.

Purpose The recommended treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) currently is surgery in stage I disease. We wondered about stage II SCLC and present a meta-analysis on mean-survival of patients that underwent surgery for stage I and II compared to controls. Methods A systematic literature search was performed on December 01st 2021 in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. We considered studies published on the effect of surgery in SCLC since 2004 and assessed them using ROBINS-I. We preformed I2-tests, Q-statistics, DerSimonian-Laird tests and Egger-regression. The meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA. Results Out of 6826 records, seven studies with a total of 11,241 patients (‘surgery group’: 3911 patients; ‘non-surgery group’: 7330; treatment period: 1984–2015) were included. Heterogeneity between the studies was revealed in absence of any publication bias. Patient characteristics did not differ between the groups (p-value > 0.05). The mean-survival in an analysis of patients in stage I was 36.7 ± 10.8 months for the ‘surgery group’ and 20.3 ± 5.7 months for the ‘non-surgery group’ (p-value = 0.0084). A combined analysis of patients in stage I and II revealed a mean-survival of 32.0 ± 16.7 months for the ‘surgery group’ and 19.1 ± 6.1 months for the ‘non-surgery group’ (p-value = 0.0391). In a separate analysis of stage II, we were able to demonstrate a significant survival benefit after surgery (21.4 ± 3.6 versus 16.2 ± 3.9 months; p-value = 0.0493). Conclusion Our meta-analysis shows a significant survival benefit after surgery not only in the recommended stage I but also in stage II SCLC. Our data suggests that both stages should be considered for surgery of early SCLC.

ZusammenfassungDer Stellenwert der Thymektomie in der Therapie der thymomfreien Myasthenia gravis blieb bis vor einiger Zeit umstritten. Die relativ geringe Inzidenz und Prävalenz der Erkrankung, die uneinheitliche Dokumentation in den verschiedenen Studien sowie die notwendige Langzeitbeobachtung zur Erfassung therapeutischer Effekte erschwerten das Generieren valider Daten. Die Veröffentlichung des MGTX-Trials 2016 im New England Journal of Medicine lieferte die ersten randomisiert-kontrollierten Daten, nach denen Patienten mit Acetylcholin-Rezeptor-Antikörper-positiver generalisierter Myasthenia gravis im Alter von 18 bis 65 Jahren von der chirurgischen Resektion des Thymus über eine mediane Sternotomie profitieren. Trotz fehlender Validierung des Vorteils der Thymektomie über minimal-invasive Techniken durch randomisiert-kontrollierte Studien scheinen diese das Outcome bestimmter Patientengruppen in ähnlicher Form positiv zu beeinflussen. So haben videoassistiert-thorakoskopische, roboterassistierte, subxiphoidale und transzervikale Zugangswege nicht nur ästhetische Vorteile, sondern zeigen in der Beeinflussung des Krankheitsverlaufs der Myasthenia gravis keine relevante Unterlegenheit gegenüber der medianen Sternotomie. Doch nicht nur der Nutzen und das ästhetische Ergebnis differieren, sondern auch die Erfolgsaussichten im Hinblick auf die Remission sind bei den Unterformen der Myasthenia gravis unterschiedlich. Die heterogene Gruppe der Myasthenien unterscheidet sich bezüglich des Auftretens von Autoantikörpern, der betroffenen Körperregionen und des Alters der Patienten bei Erstdiagnose. Schließlich ist die Thymektomie eine wirksame kausale Therapie der Myasthenia gravis.

OBJECTIVES Bovine and porcine pericardial patches are frequently used in cardiothoracic and vascular surgery. There are no guidelines recommending the usage of these patches for particular surgical approaches. However, these 2 materials supposedly possess different properties. The clinical advantage of porcine compared with bovine patches remains controversial. In this experimental study, we analysed the incorporation and vascularization of bovine and porcine pericardial patches during the initial phase after implantation. METHODS Bovine and porcine pericardial patches were implanted into the dorsal skinfold chamber of C57BL/6 mice (n = 8 per group) to study vascularization and inflammation at the implantation site using repetitive intravital fluorescence microscopy over a 14-day period. At the end of the in vivo experiments, CD-31-positive cells were determined to evaluate the vascularization by immunohistochemistry. Furthermore, cell proliferation and apoptosis were analysed immunohistochemically. RESULTS Implanted bovine patches exhibited an enhanced vascularization, as indicated by a significantly higher number of CD-31-positive cells and micro-vessels (23.2 ± 4.3 vs 16.5 ± 5.8 mm−2; P = 0.001). Furthermore, bovine patches showed a slightly but not significantly higher functional capillary density. Both patches induced a moderate leukocytic inflammatory host tissue response, and neither bovine nor porcine patches significantly affected apoptosis and cell proliferation at the implantation site. CONCLUSIONS Bovine and porcine pericardial patches are similarly suitable for surgery. Bovine patches exhibited an improved vascularization during the first 14 days after implantation. This may result in a quicker and improved incorporation into the surrounding tissue compared with porcine pericardial patches.

Purpose Resection is guideline recommended in stage I small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) but not in stage II. In this stage, patients are treated with a non-surgical approach. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the role of surgery in both SCLC stages. Surgically treated patients were compared to non-surgical controls. Five-year survival rates were analysed. Methods A systematic literature search was performed on December 01, 2021 in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. Studies published since 2004 on the effect of surgery in SCLC were considered and assessed using ROBINS-I. We preformed I2-tests, Q-statistics, DerSimonian-Laird tests and Egger-regression. The meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA. Results Out of 6826 records, we identified seven original studies with a total of 15,170 patients that met our inclusion criteria. We found heterogeneity between these studies and ruled out any publication bias. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups (p-value > 0.05). The 5-year survival rates in stage I were 47.4 ± 11.6% for the ‘surgery group’ and 21.7 ± 11.3% for the ‘non-surgery group’ (p-value = 0.0006). Our analysis of stage II SCLC revealed a significant survival benefit after surgery (40.2 ± 21.6% versus 21.2 ± 17.3%; p-value = 0.0474). Conclusion Based on our data, the role of surgery in stage I and II SCLC is robust, since it improves the long-term survival in both stages significantly. Hence, feasibility of surgery as a priority treatment should always be evaluated not only in stage I SCLC but also in stage II, for which guideline recommendations might have to be reassessed.

No abstract

No abstract