Background
Inclusive research is studied mainly in short‐term collaborations between researchers with and without intellectual disabilities focusing on practicalities. Structural study of long‐term collaborations can provide insight into different roles of inclusive researchers, thereby contributing to a collective approach.
Method
Interviews with inclusive research team members (n = 3), colleagues (n = 8), and managers (n = 2) and three group discussions within the inclusive research team were held. Data were analysed following membership categorization analysis (MCA) adapted to the needs of the inclusive research team.
Results
This MCA provides insight into the complexity of inclusive research, reflected in the multitude of identified roles and activities. Analysis indicates that researchers with and without intellectual disabilities complement each other.
Conclusions
The activities identified in this study provide valuable information for discussing roles and responsibilities from the outset, so that dialogue starts at the core of inclusive research: the process between researchers with and without intellectual disabilities.
The active involvement of people with intellectual disabilities (ID) in research is expected to lead to relevant research outcomes, increased quality of life, improved healthcare, reduction of health inequities, and empowerment of people with ID. Despite the developments in inclusive health research, a lack of transparency remains with regard to how the partnership between researchers with and without ID is shaped and structural study of inclusive health research is needed. This study aims to gain insight into the experiences of inclusive research teams in practice regarding (1) reasons, (2) attributes, and (3) outcomes of inclusive health research. A structural study of four inclusive research teams was conducted in Ireland, Northern Ireland, and the Netherlands using case study methodology. Data were triangulated through documents and individual and group interviews. Data were analyzed and synthesized using domain and taxonomic analysis. Reasons for conducting inclusive research ranged from personal to practical. Having an inclusive ethos was found to be crucial in conducting inclusive research meaningfully in practice. Based on data analysis, attributes of inclusive research consist of three interrelated themes, one focusing on methodological aspects and two focusing on active involvement and partnerships. Outcomes of inclusive research across cases were found within three categories relating to research practice, inclusion itself, and interpersonal outcomes. Empowerment was found to be important. Although empowerment is not new to inclusive research, its positive effect on research quality appears to be new and needs further research. This study's results and the literature indicate that developing inclusive research policy and practice requires a realistic perspective, with a balance between maximum collaboration and using researchers' strengths. The results of this study are transferrable to inclusive research using similar methods with other groups. When the aim is to share learning in groups, a shared language is needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.