2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topics, methods and challenges in health promotion for people with intellectual disabilities: A structured review of literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
58
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Topics addressed were the following: main characteristics of health promotion intervention studies (Naaldenberg et al . ); feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness and effectiveness (FAME) of interventions for tobacco or alcohol use in people with mild or moderate intellectual disability (Kerr et al . ); evidence for physical activity and nutrition health promotion interventions (Heller et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topics addressed were the following: main characteristics of health promotion intervention studies (Naaldenberg et al . ); feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness and effectiveness (FAME) of interventions for tobacco or alcohol use in people with mild or moderate intellectual disability (Kerr et al . ); evidence for physical activity and nutrition health promotion interventions (Heller et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) as determined by ‘physical, cognitive and behavioural impairments’ (Naaldenberg et al . , p. 4535) and social determinants (Haider et al . ), improving the health outcomes of people with an intellectual disability remains a challenge (Ministry of Health ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), considering that individuals with intellectual disabilities often experience a variety of health challenges (Naaldenberg et al . ) and face various personal, social and contextual barriers to physical activity (Shields et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%