SUMMARY Malassezia species are members of the human cutaneous commensal flora, in addition to causing a wide range of cutaneous and systemic diseases in suitably predisposed individuals. Studies examining cellular and humoral immune responses specific to Malassezia species in patients with Malassezia-associated diseases and healthy controls have generally been unable to define significant differences in their immune response. The use of varied antigenic preparations and strains from different Malassezia classifications may partly be responsible for this, although these problems can now be overcome by using techniques based on recent work defining some important antigens and also a new taxonomy for the genus. The finding that the genus Malassezia is immunomodulatory is important in understanding its ability to cause disease. Stimulation of the reticuloendothelial system and activation of the complement cascade contrasts with its ability to suppress cytokine release and downregulate phagocytic uptake and killing. The lipid-rich layer around the yeast appears to be pivotal in this alteration of phenotype. Defining the nonspecific immune response to Malassezia species and the way in which the organisms modulate it may well be the key to understanding how Malassezia species can exist as both commensals and pathogens.

Malassezia yeasts are commensals of normal human skin, but also cause pityriasis versicolor, seborrhoeic dermatitis and evidence is accumulating that they play a significant role in atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome (AEDS; formerly atopic dermatitis). The taxonomy of the genus has changed considerably and is likely to change more in the future. Our understanding of the interaction between Malassezia and the host demonstrates that it has the paradoxical ability to both stimulate and suppress the immune response directed against it and there is a fine balance in its existence at the interface between commensalism and pathogenicity.

The purpose of this survey was to systematically collect data on individuals with histoplasmosis in Europe over a 5-year period (from January 1995 to December 1999). This included information on where and how the infection was acquired, the patient's risk factors, the causative organism, how the infection was diagnosed and what therapy the patients received. Data were sent on a standardized survey form via a national convenor to the coordinator. During the survey, 118 cases were reported, with 62 patients having disseminated disease, 31 acute pulmonary infection, chronic pulmonary infection in 6 and localized disease in 2 patients. For 17 patients, the diagnosis of histoplasmosis was incidental, usually secondary to investigations for lung cancer. Most patients had travelled to known endemic areas, but 8 patients (from Italy, Germany and Turkey) indicated that they had not been outside their countries of origin and hence these cases appear to be autochthonous. Notable observations during the survey were the reactivation of the disease up to 50 years after the initial infection in some patients and transmission of the infection by a transplanted liver. Itraconazole was the most commonly used therapy in both pulmonary and disseminated disease. The observation of autochthonous cases of disease suggests that the endemic area of histoplasmosis is wider than classically reported and supports continued surveillance of the disease throughout Europe.

No abstract

No abstract

The aetiological role of Malassezia furfur in various dermatoses is controversial. The role of the three serovars of M. furfur in Malassezia-associated diseases has not been investigated. This study measured population densities of M. furfur serovars A, B and C, propionibacteria and Micrococcaceae on the chest, back, forehead, left and right cheeks of 10 patients with pityriasis versicolor, and 10 age- and sex-matched controls; and 10 patients with seborrhoeic dermatitis, and 10 age- and sex-matched controls. The population densities of M. furfur, propionibacteria and Micrococcaceae did not vary at a given site between patients and the corresponding control subjects. Malassezia furfur serovar A was found to be the predominant isolate on the chest and back of all four groups, but there was no difference in the distribution of serovars on the forehead and cheeks. No serovar was specifically associated with lesional skin in either disease. Thus, this data indicated that there was no difference in either the total population density of M. furfur or the distribution of serovars on lesional skin compared with control skin in either pityriasis versicolor or seborrhoeic dermatitis.

Malassezia spp. are members of the normal cutaneous flora, but are also associated with several cutaneous diseases. Recent studies of the interaction of Malassezia spp. with melanocytes, fibroblasts, keratinocytes and dendritic cells have highlighted their potential to modulate the immune response directed against them. In normal skin they may downregulate the inflammatory response, allowing them to live as commensals. In contrast, in atopic/eczema dermatitis syndrome and psoriasis, they may elicit an inflammatory response that contributes to the maintenance of lesions. Future research may define ways to influence this inflammatory cycle and hence to control or prevent exacerbations of these diseases.

No abstract