Since the initial report in 1978 of galactopoietic effects of a photoperiod of 16 h of light:8 h of darkness, numerous studies have confirmed long-day stimulation of milk yield. The endocrine factor(s) responsible for increased milk yield, however, has eluded identification. Recent studies suggest that insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) may mediate the galactopoietic response to long day photoperiod. Indeed, long days increase IGF-I in heifers and lactating cows; in the latter case, the response preceded an increase in milk yield. In heifers and cows, the increase in IGF-I is independent of changes in circulating growth hormone. Melatonin feeding to mimic a short-day photoperiod suppressed the increase of IGF-I in heifers induced by long days. However, melatonin feeding had no effect on milk yield in cows. Despite lack of resolution of the endocrine mechanism, dairy producers are interested in how photoperiod management can be integrated with current practices throughout the lactation cycle. There is strong evidence that milk yield responses to long days persist through an entire lactation. Also, long days can be combined with bovine somatotropin (bST) to produce additive increases in milk yield. During the dry period, long days increase the periparturient surge of prolactin. However, relative to long days, short-day treatment during the dry period produces the largest magnitude of response in milk yield during the subsequent lactation. The response to short days during the dry period may be due to a priming effect on the photoperiodic response system. In summary, IGF-I has emerged as a possible mediator of the increase of milk yield in response to long-day photoperiod. Photoperiod can be combined effectively with other management techniques such as bST. Consideration of photoperiod management during the dry period is essential to maximize responses during the subsequent lactation.

This experiment investigated the influence of plane of nutrition on mammary development in heifers. Prepubertal and postpubertal heifers were fed a ration 60:40 concentrate to forage in restricted or ad libitum amounts. Dry matter intake of the heifers on restricted feeding was 60% that of heifers fed ad libitum. Average daily gain of heifers on restricted feeding was 613 g compared with 1218 g for heifers fed ad libitum. Ad libitum feeding during prepuberty lowered mammary secretory tissue weights 23% and deoxyribonucleic acid content 32% compared to restricted feeding. In contrast, there was no difference in growth of mammary secretory tissue between postpubertal heifers fed restricted or ad libitum amounts. Composition of mammary parenchyma was not affected by plane of nutrition in prepubertal or postpubertal heifers. From these data, we suggest a critical period for total mammary cell number in heifers during which mammary growth is affected adversely by a high plane of nutrition.

When I was a beginning graduate student 41 yr ago it had been established that estrogen caused mammary duct growth; a combination of estrogen and progesterone was required for lobule-alveolar development of the mammary glands; and prolactin and growth hormone were essential for mammary growth. In laboratory species exogenous prolactin, glucocorticoids, and estrogen would initiate secretion of milk provided the mammary glands had a well-developed lobule-alveolar system. It was not known with certainty that progesterone inhibited the process. For some species, prolactin and thyroxine had been shown to stimulate lactation, while glucocorticoids suppressed lactation. Definitive roles for growth hormone and insulin during lactation had not been established. Studies of hormonal control of mammary growth and function in cattle were few. In vitro methods to study hormonal regulation of the mammary glands were in their infancy. Quantitative measures of changes in mammary cell numbers and specific components of milk in response to hormones were rare. The concepts for quantification of hormone concentrations, hormone receptors, growth factors, and binding proteins in blood; hormonal regulation of nutrient partitioning; and hormonally induced mechanisms of action within mammary cells were waiting to be discovered. And eventually they were. However, lest we become too enamored with our current understanding of the hormones that control mammary growth and lactation, it remains a fact that the greatest physiological stimulus for milk yield is pregnancy, not some cocktail of exogenous hormones, growth factors, receptor agonists/antagonists, or gene therapies. Viva la mom!

No abstract

Forty Holstein heifers [body weight (BW) = 126 kg] were blocked by BW into groups of 4, and, within each block, heifers were randomly assigned to one of four treatments. Twenty heifers had ad libitum access to a diet formulated to produce a BW gain of 0.8 kg/d (control diet), and 20 heifers had ad libitum access to a diet formulated to produce a BW gain of 1.2 kg/d. (high diet). Half of the heifers fed each diet were injected daily with bovine somatotropin (bST; 25 micrograms/ kg of BW). The high diet increased daily BW gain as well as body condition score. Injection of bST also increased daily BW gain, but did not affect body condition score. The high diet reduced age at puberty by 58 d, but did not affect BW, withers height at puberty, or pelvic area at slaughter. Injection of bST had no effect on age at puberty, but increased BW, withers height at puberty, and pelvic area at slaughter. The high diet did not affect mammary parenchymal DNA, RNA, or the ratio of RNA to DNA. The injection of bST increased mammary parenchymal DNA, RNA, and the ratio of RNA to DNA. The high diet was more cost effective for rearing dairy heifers from 120 d of age to potential breeding size (> or = 363 kg of BW and postpubertal) than was the control diet. In conclusion, the high protein, high energy diet increased growth rate without detrimental effects on mammary development. Injection of bST increased BW, skeletal size, and mammary development.