Worldwide wheat yields have been only slightly, and non-significantly, increasing during the 90's, suggesting that they may be levelling off. Considering that there is consensus that large new growing areas will be not introduced and management improvements will be increasingly harder to obtain, genetic improvement would play a more important role to keep rising wheat yields in the future than in the past. In this scenario, the use of physiological bases as a complementary tool to identifying alternative ways for breeding seems to be crucial for breaking the apparent barriers in wheat yields. In this presentation, we attempted to envisage, from published and recent unpublished evidences from our lab, using studies carried out under both controlled and field conditions, some opportunities to manipulate the rate of crop development during the late reproductive phase. This phase has been recognised as critical in terms of yield generation, and the idea of manipulating its response to photoperiod as a tool for increasing yield potential in wheat is reviewed.

Asymmetry of investment in crop research leads to knowledge gaps and lost opportunities to accelerate genetic gain through identifying new sources and combinations of traits and alleles. On the basis of consultation with scientists from most major seed companies, we identified several research areas with three common features: (i) relatively underrepresented in the literature; (ii) high probability of boosting productivity in a wide range of crops and environments; and (iii) could be researched in 'precompetitive' space, leveraging previous knowledge, and thereby improving models that guide crop breeding and management decisions. Areas identified included research into hormones, recombination, respiration, roots, and source-sink, which, along with new opportunities in phenomics, genomics, and bioinformatics, make it more feasible to explore crop genetic resources and improve breeding strategies. Asymmetry in Crop ResearchResearch into crop growth and adaptation under diverse cultivation scenarios has underpinned global food security, especially since the Green Revolution, during which time the global population has more than doubled. During the same time, the global area of cultivated cereals, which account for more than 70% of total calories consumed by humans, has barely changed while yields have tripled. i These two statistics alone clearly support the impact of crop research on breeding and agronomy as well as effective policy decisions and the agility of farmers to adopt new technologies [1,2]. Nonetheless, the challenges that global agriculture now faces are not just to feed 10+ billion people within a generation, but to do so under a harsher and less predictable climate, and in many cases with less water and declining soil quality [1]. Clearly, research, breeding, and agronomy must be even more effective. HighlightsMore symmetrical investment in crop research will create opportunities to improve crop models, combine new alleles through prebreeding, and suggest novel crop management practices.Consensus among public and private sectors is that more investment is needed to improve understanding of hormone crosstalk, recombination rate, maintenance respiration, root structure and function, and source-sink balance.Greater investment in these areas is expected to benefit a wide range of crops across most environments.

No abstract

No abstract

Està subjecte a una llicència de Reconeixement-NoComercial-SenseObraDerivada 4.0 de Creative Commons

No abstract

No abstract

Fine tuning wheat phenology is of paramount importance for adaptation. A better understanding of how genetic constitution modulates the developmental responses during pre-anthesis phases would help to maintain or even increase yield potential as temperature increases due to climate change. The photoperiod-sensitive cultivar Paragon, and four near isogenic lines with different combinations of insensitivity alleles (Ppd-A1a, Ppd-B1a, Ppd-D1a or their triple stack) were evaluated under short (12 h) and long (16 h) photoperiods. Insensitivity alleles decreased time to anthesis and duration of the three pre-anthesis phases (vegetative, early reproductive and late reproductive), following the Ppd-D1a > Ppd-A1a > Ppd-B1a ranking of strength. Stacking them intensified the insensitivity, but had no additive effect over that of Ppd-D1a. The late reproductive phase was the most responsive, even exhibiting a qualitative response. Leaf plastochron was not affected but spikelet plastochron increased according to Ppd-1a ranking of strength. Earlier anthesis resulted from less leaves differentiated and a fine tuning effect of accelerated rate of leaf appearance. None of the alleles affected development exclusively during any particular pre-anthesis phase, which would be ideal for tailoring time to anthesis with specific partitioning of developmental time into particular phases. Other allelic variants should be further tested to this purpose.