Growing evidence has shown that anti‐COVID‐19 nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) can support prevention and control of various infectious diseases, including intestinal diseases. However, most studies focused on the short‐term mitigating impact and neglected the dynamic impact over time. This study is aimed to investigate the dynamic impact of anti‐COVID‐19 NPIs on hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) over time in Xi'an City, northwestern China. Based on the surveillance data of HFMD, meteorological and web search data, Bayesian Structural Time Series model and interrupted time series analysis were performed to quantitatively measure the impact of NPIs in sequent phases with different intensities and to predict the counterfactual number of HFMD cases. From 2013 to 2021, a total number of 172,898 HFMD cases were reported in Xi'an. In 2020, there appeared a significant decrease in HFMD incidence (−94.52%, 95% CI: −97.54% to −81.95%) in the first half of the year and the peak period shifted from June to October by a small margin of 6.74% compared to the previous years of 2013 to 2019. In 2021, the seasonality of HFMD incidence gradually returned to the bimodal temporal variation pattern with a significant average decline of 61.09%. In particular, the impact of NPIs on HFMD was more evident among young children (0–3 years), and the HFMD incidence reported in industrial areas had an unexpected increase of 51.71% in 2020 autumn and winter. Results suggested that both direct and indirect NPIs should be implemented as effective public health measures to reduce infectious disease and improve surveillance strategies, and HFMD incidence in Xi'an experienced a significant rebound to the previous seasonality after a prominent decline influenced by the anti‐COVID‐19 NPIs.
Electric fields, which can promote the approach of droplets and break the liquid film, are extensively used in the separation of the water phase in water-in-oil emulsions. However, there is an evolution of droplet behavior under an electric field. After the two droplets meet with each other, the electric force becomes undesirable, which would even cause breakup of the merged droplet. When the electric field strength E reaches a particular value, the final behavior of droplets is made, which goes against coalescence, and there are lots of behavior evolution types. Several research studies have studied on whether droplets coalesce and the critical condition, but few works have focused on the classification and mechanism of non-coalescence behaviors. In this paper, the behavior evolution of two single droplets suspended in castor oil under an alternating current electric field is studied by a high−speed camera. Six distinct behavior evolution modes are observed and summarized: coalescence, bounce, partial coalescence, partial rupture, coalescence−rupture, and rupture. The behavior evolution mode is influenced by the initial separation distance s 0 between droplets and the electric field strength. Moreover, there exist critical electric field strengths among different behavior evolution modes. As E gradually increases, two water droplets go through coalescence, partial coalescence, and coalescence−rupture in sequence when s 0 is small and coalescence, bounce, partial rupture, and rupture when s 0 is large. The mechanisms of behavior evolution are revealed by investigating the confrontation between electric force and capillary force in the condition with liquid bridge or pressure difference from the surrounding fluid and electric force in the condition without a liquid bridge. In addition, a cone−dimple mode of water droplets in castor oil is found, demonstrating the rationality of electric force theory.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.