Preeclampsia is characterized by increased uPRL excretion. uPRL concentrations and their isoforms appear to be suitable markers to assess the severity of preeclampsia and occurrence of adverse outcomes. PRL and and/or its isoforms might be involved in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia.

Background:The protein:creatinine ratio in random, untimed urine samples correlates with 24-h protein excretion in pregnant women with and without hypertension. Nevertheless, whether this ratio is appropriate as a screening test for proteinuria is still unclear, in part because of the paucity of large studies. Methods: We measured protein:creatinine ratios in random urine samples and protein contents of 24-h urine samples in a cross-sectional study of 927 hospitalized pregnant women at >20-weeks of gestational age and in a 2nd cohort of 161 pregnant women. In the 2nd group, urine specimens were obtained before and after completion of the 24-h collections, avoiding 1st-morning void specimens. Results: Protein excretion was >300 mg/24 h in 282 patients (30.4%). The urine protein:creatinine ratio and the 24-h protein excretion were significantly correlated (r ‫؍‬ 0.98, P <0.001). The protein:creatinine ratio as an indicator of protein excretion >300 mg/24 h was >0.3. The sensitivity and specificity were 98.2% and 98.8%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 97.2% and 99.2%, respectively, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were 79.2 and 0.02, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the urinary protein: creatinine ratio was corroborated in the 2nd cohort of patients, which also showed no statistically significant

An increase in serum free PRL levels, higher percentages of little PRL and lower percentages of big big PRL proved to be factors related to lupus activity in a subset of patients with SLE. These novel data must be taken into account in future studies aiming to establish a relationship between PRL and disease activity in SLE.

The reduced bioactivity of PRL in patients with macroprolactinaemia may further explain the absence of clinical features of hyperprolactinaemia in these individuals. In addition, our findings indicate that species-specificity and sensitivity of the bioassays are determinant factors in the measurement of the intrinsic biological activity of circulating PRL.

The aim of this study was to determine in pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) the frequency of anti-prolactin autoantibodies and to compare the outcome of pregnancy in SLE women with and without anti-prolactin autoantibodies. Ninety-nine consecutive SLE pregnant women and 151 healthy pregnant women were studied prospectively. Patients with or without anti-prolactin autoantibodies were identified by gel filtration chromatography and affinity chromatography for IgG. Serum total and free prolactin (PRL) levels and molecular heterogeneity of PRL at each trimester of pregnancy were determined. The frequency of anti-PRL autoantibodies in SLE pregnant women was 13.1%. Serum total PRL levels were significantly higher in women with anti-PRL autoantibodies compared with SLE women without anti-PRL autoantibodies and in healthy pregnant women; and serum free PRL levels were lower in the third trimester in women with anti-PRL autoantibodies than in healthy pregnant women. In contrast, serum total and free PRL levels were significantly lower in the second and third trimester in SLE pregnant women without anti-PRL autoantibodies compared with healthy pregnant women. All adverse outcomes of pregnancy studied were more frequent in SLE women without anti-PRL autoantibodies than anti-PRL autoantibody-positive SLE women. Moreover, both maternal and fetal main complications were significantly higher in SLE women without anti-PRL autoantibodies than anti-PRL autoantibody-positive SLE women (P