This work proposes the application of batch-injection analysis with amperometric detection to determine the antioxidant capacity of real samples based on the measurement of DPPH radical consumption. The efficient concentration or EC50 value corresponds to the concentration of sample or standard required to scavenge 50% DPPH radicals. For the accurate determination of EC50, samples were incubated with DPPH radical for 1h because many polyphenolic compounds typically found in plants and responsible for the antioxidant activity exhibit slow kinetics. The BIA system with amperometric detection using a glassy-carbon electrode presented high precision (RSD = 0.7%, n = 12), low detection limit (1 μmol L(-1)) and selective detection of DPPH (free of interferences from antioxidants). These contributed to low detection limits for the antioxidant (0.015 and 0.19 μmol L(-1) for gallic acid and butylated hydroxytoluene, respectively). Moreover, BIA methods show great promise for portable analysis because battery-powered instrumentation (electronic micropipette and potentiostats) is commercially available.

This article compares the use of batch‐injection analysis (BIA) with a conventional batch system for the anodic stripping voltammetric (ASV) determination of Pb, Cu and Hg in biodiesel using screen‐printed gold electrode (SPGE). The optimized BIA conditions were 200 µL of injection volume of the digested samples at 5 µL s−1 directly on the working electrode of the SPGE immersed in 0.1 mol L−1 HCl solution. Therefore, BIA‐ASV presented the advantages of low sample consumption, which extended the SPGE lifetime to a whole working day of analyses, and potential for on‐site analysis using battery‐powered micropipettes and potentiostats. Although presenting lower sensitivity than conventional systems, the BIA‐ASV presented detection limit values of 1.0, 0.5 and 0.7 µg L−1, respectively for Pb, Cu and Hg, a linear range between 20 and 280 µg L−1, and adequate recovery values (90–110 %) for spiked biodiesel samples.

This work presents the electrochemical oxidation of the antioxidant astaxanthin on a glassy‐carbon electrode (GCE) and its amperometric determination in salmon samples using a batch‐injection analysis (BIA) system. The proposed BIA method consisted of 80‐µL a fast microliter injection of sample at 193 µL s−1 on the GCE immersed in the electrolyte, a mixture of acetone, dichloromethane, and water (80 : 10 : 10 v/v), containing 0.1 mol L−1 HClO4. Advantages include high precision (RSD of 2.4 %), sample throughput of 240 h−1, and low detection limit (0.3 µmol L−1 that corresponds to 0.1 µg g−1) for the analysis of acetone extracts of salmon samples. Recovery values between 83 and 97 % attested the accuracy of the method.