No abstract

No abstract

The available alcohol biomarkers vary in sensitivity and specificity with respect to the time period over which they indicate alcohol use and the minimum extent of alcohol use that they can detect. The appropriate marker or combination of markers should be chosen in each case according to the particular question that is to be answered by laboratory analysis.

Results from toxicological analyses in death investigations are used to determine whether foreign substances were a cause of death, whether they contributed to death, or whether they caused impairment. Drug concentrations are likely to change during pre-terminal stages due to altered pharmacokinetics, to treatment during resuscitation or in the intensive care unit, to concomitant illness or to the presence of drug tolerance. The potential for postmortem changes must be considered in all but a few drugs. Formation of new entities as well as degradation of drugs may occur, especially in putrefied corpses; in addition, body fluids and tissues may be severely affected by autolysis and putrefaction. Specimens should be selected based on individual case history and on their availability. Analytical procedures should be performed in accordance with a proper quality assurance program for toxicological investigations. Problems are most likely to occur during the isolation and identification of a drug. Interpretation of analytical results is often limited by the inadequate information provided in a particular case.

No abstract

The kinetic profile of ethanol and ethyl glucuronide (EtG) in serum was investigated in three subject groups: 1) Healthy, moderately drinking volunteers (daily intake less than 30 g ethanol) who ingested a single dose of ethanol. In this group the maximum of serum ethyl glucuronide concentration (SEtGC) and of serum ethanol concentration (SEC) did not exceed 3.7 mg/L and 1.5 g/L respectively. EtG peaked 2 to 3.5 h later than ethanol. EtG was eliminated with a terminal half-life of 2 to 3 h. EtG decreased slower than ethanol—the metabolite could still be determined in serum up to 8 h after complete ethanol elimination. 2) In serum samples of teetotalers neither ethanol nor EtG could be found. 3) In 37 of 50 serum samples of drivers suspected of driving under the influence of ethanol, SEtGC was found between the limit of detection (0.1 mg/L) and 20 mg/L. If the SEC is less than 1 g/L and the SEtGC is significantly higher than 5 mg/L, we assume alcohol misuse.

Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is an abnormal phospholipid carrying two fatty acid chains. It is only formed in the presence of ethanol via the action of phospholipase D (PLD). Its use as a biomarker for alcohol consumption is currently under investigation. Previous methods for the analysis of PEth included high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD), which is unspecific for the different homologues--improved methods are now based on time of flight mass spectrometry (TOF-MS) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). The intention of this work was to identify as many homologues of PEth as possible. A screening procedure using multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) for the identified homologues has subsequently been established. For our investigations, autopsy blood samples collected from heavy drinkers were used. Phosphatidylpropanol 16:0/18:1 (internal standard) was added to the blood samples prior to liquid-liquid extraction using borate buffer (pH 9), 2-propanol and n-hexane. After evaporation, the samples were redissolved in the mobile phase and injected into the LC-MS/MS system. Compounds were separated on a Luna Phenyl Hexyl column (50 mm x 2 mm, 3 microm) by gradient elution, using 2 mM ammonium acetate and methanol/acetone (95/5; v/v). A total of 48 homologues of PEth could be identified by using precursor ion and enhanced product ion scans (EPI).

Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a new, highly specific alcohol marker. The aim of this study was to assess its diagnostic value in the liver transplant setting. In 51 pre- and 61 post-transplant patients with underlying alcoholic liver disease PEth, ethanol, methanol, carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT), and ethyl glucuronide in urine (uEtG) and hair (hEtG) were tested and compared with patients' questionnaire reports. Twenty-eight (25%) patients tested positive for at least one alcohol marker. PEth alone revealed alcohol consumption in 18% of patients. With respect to detection of alcohol intake in the preceding week, PEth showed a 100% sensitivity. PEth testing was more sensitive than the determination of ethanol, methanol, CDT or uEtG alone [sensitivity 25% (confidence interval (CI) 95%, 7-52%), 25% (7-52%), 21% (6-45%) and 71% (41-91%), respectively], or ethanol, methanol and uEtG taken in combination with 73% (45-92%). Specificity of all markers was 92% or higher. Additional testing of hEtG revealed alcohol consumption in seven patients, not being positive for any other marker. Phosphatidylethanol was a highly specific and sensitive marker for detection of recent alcohol consumption in pre- and post-transplant patients. The additional determination of hEtG was useful in disclosing alcohol consumption 3-6 months retrospectively.