1997
DOI: 10.1520/jfs14267j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethyl Glucuronide Concentration in Serum of Human Volunteers, Teetotalers, and Suspected Drinking Drivers

Abstract: The kinetic profile of ethanol and ethyl glucuronide (EtG) in serum was investigated in three subject groups: 1) Healthy, moderately drinking volunteers (daily intake less than 30 g ethanol) who ingested a single dose of ethanol. In this group the maximum of serum ethyl glucuronide concentration (SEtGC) and of serum ethanol concentration (SEC) did not exceed 3.7 mg/L and 1.5 g/L respectively. EtG peaked 2 to 3.5 h later than ethanol. EtG was eliminated with a terminal half-life of 2 to 3 h. EtG decreased slowe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
81
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
8
81
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethyl glucuronide [ethyl-b-D-6-glucuronic acid (ethyl glucuronide); EtG] can be detected in various body fluids, tissues, and hair. It is eliminated with a terminal half-life of 2 to 3 hours (Schmitt et al, 1997) and presents a particularly interesting detection window in body fluids (up to 8 hours and 5 days after complete ethanol elimination, in serum and urine, respectively (Schmitt et al, 1997;Wurst et al, 1999). EtG determination is also much more sensitive and specific than conventional markers (e.g., g-glutamyl transferase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, mean corpuscular volume, and carbohydrate-deficient transferrin).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethyl glucuronide [ethyl-b-D-6-glucuronic acid (ethyl glucuronide); EtG] can be detected in various body fluids, tissues, and hair. It is eliminated with a terminal half-life of 2 to 3 hours (Schmitt et al, 1997) and presents a particularly interesting detection window in body fluids (up to 8 hours and 5 days after complete ethanol elimination, in serum and urine, respectively (Schmitt et al, 1997;Wurst et al, 1999). EtG determination is also much more sensitive and specific than conventional markers (e.g., g-glutamyl transferase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, mean corpuscular volume, and carbohydrate-deficient transferrin).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EtG (4,17,18 ) and, more recently, EtS (3,19,20 ) have been introduced as sensitive and specific biomarkers for detection of recent alcohol consumption, with major advantages compared with conventional ethanol testing, including a much longer detection time (i.e., improved sensitivity) with retained high specificity. Our results demonstrated, however, that EtG may not be stable on storage if the urine specimens taken for analysis are infected with pathogens possessing ␤-glucuronidase activity (typically E. coli).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marijuana is by far the most prevalent among the illicit drugs, followed by cocaine and methamphetamine. From the table it is clear that alcohol use is about 10% as measured by the presence of alcohol's metabolites ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS) Dahl et al, 2002;Helander & Beck, 2005;Helander et al, 1996;Schmitt et al, 1997;Stephanson et al, 2002;Wojcik & Hawthorne, 2007;Wurst et al, 2006;Wurst et al, 2004). These data show that in order to provide appropriate monitoring and decrease risk and mortality for this population, a broad test menu is needed.…”
Section: Limitations Of Immunoassaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For doctors to understand UDT ethanol results, it is essential that they understand ethanol metabolism and the formation of the ethanol byproducts ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate Crews et al, 2011b;Dahl et al, 2002;Helander & Beck, 2005;Helander et al, 1996;Rosano & Lin, 2008;Schmitt et al, 1997;Stephanson et al, 2002;Wojcik & Hawthorne, 2007;Wurst et al, 2006;Wurst et al, 2004). This is because false positive ethanol results can result from fermentation of glucose from diabetic patient samples .…”
Section: Monitoring Ethanol Use In Pain Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%