Blood glucose levels may be high in headache patients, but do not seem to be specific to migraineurs. Insulin levels were higher in migraineurs, and seemed specific to this group. These findings are in keeping with recent reports on the effects of insulin on brain functions and lend support to the possibility that insulin is involved in the pathogenesis of migraine.

IntroductionMigraine is a very complex condition; in fact its physiopathology is not completely clear [1]. It is believed that many neurotransmitters are implicated in this process [2], and hormones have been shown to play a major role in women [3]. Among the neuroendocrinological alterations, disorders of the hypothalamic-hypophysial axis are believed to be implicated in the pathogenesis of primary J Headache Pain (2006) 7:83-89 DOI 10.1007 High prolactin levels as a worsening factor for migraine

ObjectivesA multicenter study to compare results of BRAHMS Kryptor PCT with those obtained using four BRAHMS-partnered procalcitonin (PCT) automated immunoassays (DiaSorin Liaison, BioMérieux Vidas, Roche Cobas E601 and Siemens Advia Centaur) and the Diazyme immunotubidimetric assay implemented on four clinical chemistry platforms (Abbott Architect c16000, Siemens Advia 2400, Roche Cobas C501 and Beckman Coulter AU5800).Design and methodsOne hundred serum samples from in-patients with PCT values between 0.10 and 58.7 ng/mL were divided into aliquots and tested with the nine different reagents and analyzers. BRAHMS PCT Kryptor results were used as reference.ResultsCompared to BRAHMS PCT Kryptor, significant differences in results were observed on Vidas, Advia Centaur, Architect, Cobas C501 and AU5800. However, the correlation coeffiecients (r) with BRAHMS PCT Kryptor were between 0.899 and 0.988. The mean bias was less than ±1.02 ng/mL, except for Vidas (2.70 ng/mL). The agreement at three clinically relevant cut-offs was optimal: between 83–98% at 0.50 ng/mL, 90–97% at 2.0 ng/mL, and 98% at 10 ng/mL. The comparison of Diazyme PCT across the four clinical chemistry analyzers yielded high correlation coefficients (r between 0.952 and 0.976), a mean bias less than ±0.9 ng/mL, acceptable agreement at 0.5 ng/mL (>82%), and high concordance at the 2.0 ng/mL (>97%) and 10 ng/mL (>98%) cut-offs.ConclusionsThe methods and applications evaluated in this multicenter study are aligned with BRAHMS PCT Kryptor and can be used for predicting the risk of progression to systemic inflammation in patients with bacterial infections using the conventional PCT diagnostic thresholds.

No abstract

Summary. Background: It has been observed that migraineurs show a higher risk of thrombosis and that the most frequent symptom reported by patients with antiphospholipid syndrome is headache, especially migraine. Objectives: The aim of our research was to evaluate the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in a random cohort of migraineurs. Patients/Methods: This analytic, comparative case study was performed to evaluate the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies by comparing a population of migraineurs with and without aura with sex-and age-matched controls. Both the diagnosis of migraine and the laboratory diagnosis of aPL positivity were made on the basis of the most recent international guidelines. Results: Between September 2008 and August 2009, we recruited 284 consecutive patients (225 women and 59 men, 203 without aura and 81 with aura) and 225 controls (174 women and 51 men). Positivity for at least one test for aPL (LAC, ACA IgG or antiß2GLP1 IgG) was detected and confirmed in 12% (n = 33) of patients and in 3% (n = 7) of controls (odds ratio, 4.08; confidence interval, 1.77-9:39; P = 0.0004). Two of the patients had triple positivity for aPL (LAC, ACA and antiß2GLP1) and one had double positivity (LAC and antiß2GLP1); none of the controls showed multiple positivity. Conclusions: Our data show that migraineurs have a significantly higher prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies, and point towards the fact that the two conditions may be comorbid or even that migraine may be an early sign for identifying patients with aPL positivity.

In the context of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, rapid and easy-to-perform diagnostic methods are essential to limit the spread of the virus and for the clinical management of COVID-19 patients. Although real-time polymerase chain reaction remains the “gold standard” to diagnose acute infections, this technique is expensive, requires trained personnel, well-equipped laboratory and is time-consuming. A prospective evaluation of the Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 point-of-care testing that uses isothermal nucleic acid amplification for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RdRp gene was run in the Emergency Department during the third wave of COVID-19 pandemic. ID-NOW significantly simplified SARS-CoV-2 identification and COVID-19 patient triaging, being highly valuable in rapidly locating febrile patients in or out of COVID-19 areas, and can be considered as a first-line diagnostic test in the Emergency Room setting.

No abstract

No abstract