This article shows that a shift towards a more centralized school system can benefit countries that are characterized by poor levels of human capital and large regional disparities in education. In 1911, Italy moved from a fully decentralized primary school system towards centralization through the Daneo-Credaro Reform. The design of the Reform allows us to compare treated municipalities with those that retained school autonomy. Our quasi-experiment, based on propensity score matching (PSM), shows that centralization substantially increased the pace of human capital accumulation. Treated municipalities were characterized by a 0.43 percentage-point premium on the average annual growth of literacy between 1911 and 1921. We discuss some of the channels through which the new legislation affected primary schooling and literacy, with important implications for long-term economic growth.H uman capital formation is widely acknowledged as one of the main factors of economic growth, and this is supported by several well-established theoretical models. 1 Empirical evidence has confirmed that human skills and abilities are central to economic performance in the present day, as well as in the past. 2 As a result of this, one of the crucial themes investigated by the literature is the way that school systems are organized; that is, the extent to which schooling is managed and funded by local or central levels of government. Several pros and cons of * Authors' Affiliations: Gabriele Cappelli, University of Siena and University of Barcelona; Michelangelo Vasta, University of Siena. † We wish to thank one of the editors of this journal, Giovanni Federico, and three anonymous referees, for their constructive and very useful comments. The article also benefited from helpful feedback from
Italy's regions experienced different rates of human capital accumulation in the latenineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. Although Southern regions were very disadvantaged when the unification of the country took place in 1861, they caught up at a very slow pace -and a remarkable regional divide in education persisted until the Interwar period. While previous hypotheses have focused on the role played by fiscal capacity, this paper sheds new light on the effect that enfranchisement had on the growth of schooling. The presence of large regional disparities in local electoral franchise is confirmed by the data; however, the relationship between voting rights, the intensity of local direct taxation and municipal fiscal capacity is weak at best. Furthermore, if the impact of these factors is analysed separately through a number of econometric models, fiscal capacity stands out as the most significant determinant of education across Italy's provinces. Against recent hypotheses, these results show that the different distribution of political voice within Italy's municipalities did not determine the persistence of regional inequalities in schooling in the long-run: it was Italy's national education system, together with remarkable and pre-existent regional disparities, that slowed down the development of human capital in rural and Southern regions, with immense costs in terms of future prospects for economic growth and human development.
The present paper explores the role of public policy in the development of Italy's human capital in the late 19 th century and the Interwar period. It aims at understanding whether a system of decentralized primary education slowed down regional convergence in schooling. This work puts forward the hypothesis that, under such a system, the country was subject to a human capital trap-since poor and backward areas could not afford to invest a suitable amount of resources in schooling. Additionally, it investigates whether a more centralized system, introduced in 1911, loosened up the trap, fostered the accumulation of human capital and reduced the country's regional disparities. Original qualitative evidence and new data on schooling confirm the existence of such a trap, and underline the positive role of centralization in the Interwar period. The econometric model implemented strengthens these findings: poor regions could not improve the quality of education, which in turn would give rise to a vicious circle. Centralized primary education certainly fostered the development of Italy's schooling in the Interwar period. However, human capital regional disparities across the country persisted, a result that calls for further research on the topic.
Despite recent research about the link between social capital and economic growth, the degree to which social norms influenced the first phase of Italy’s regional economic divergence remains largely unexplored. A methodology based on a multifaceted definition of social capital, employing data about charity, mutual aid, and crime permits estimates of the differences in the strength of trust and cooperative norms across Italy’s provinces at ten-year intervals between 1871 and 1911. Further analysis of trust and cooperative norms via regression models of conditional convergence in industrial value added per capita shows that, although regional disparities in social capital were large during the late nineteenth century, they are not strongly correlated with industrial growth. Instead, the evidence indicates that human capital, innovation, and formal institutions were far more instrumental in determining the economic fortunes of Italy’s provinces before the World War I.
tj ; 3Cet article analyse le processus de convergence éducative en France et en Italie, au niveau régional, sur le long XIX e siècle, lorsque les deux systèmes éducatifs répondaient d’une organisation décentralisée. Une nouvelle base de donnée harmonisée sur l’éducation primaire est présentée. Elle inclut des estimations des ratios bruts de scolarisation primaire, des dépenses municipales par enfant en âge scolaire et des aides publiques des départements français et des provinces italiennes. L’analyse montre qu’une convergence éducative, au niveau régional, est apparue bien avant le passage à une organisation centralisée des systèmes éducatifs dans les deux pays. Toutefois, le rythme de la convergence régionale s’est accéléré durant cette transition, et l’ampleur des investissements et aides de l’État a constitué un facteur d’importance pour la convergence régionale. Bien que de plus amples développement soient requis – incluant notamment des facteurs rattachés à la demande d’éducation – les résultats suggèrent, qu’au-delà de la simple réponse du marché et des caractéristiques de la demande éducative, les institutions et la politique publique ont constitué plutôt des « mains visibles », qui jouèrent un rôle important pour le développement de l’éducation dans les régions d’Europe du sud-ouest.
This article provides the first harmonized quantitative evidence on the rise of mass education across the provinces (today's NUTS 3) of Italy and Spain in the period c. 1861–1921. Visual analysis of this new dataset suggests that an important factor linked to the expansion of schooling was the feminization of the teaching profession, something that has been largely neglected so far in quantitative historical studies of educational development. This hypothesis is put to the test using panel‐data models. The results show that the feminization of teaching went hand in hand with the rise of schooling rates by prompting more girls to enrol into primary education. By the beginning of the twentieth century, Italy's gross enrolment rate had surpassed that of Spain—partly as the result of increasing feminization within the primary‐school teaching profession.
In this remarkable volume, the editors present thirteen national case studies of the origins and outcomes of school acts that were passed during the construction of public school systems in the long nineteenth century. The chapter authors are leading scholars in the history of education who demonstrate both the distinctive process of school formation in different countries and the parallel processes and shared conceptions that shaped the process. Not only does the book allow us to understand the emergence of mass schooling in comparative context, but it also fosters an understanding that incorporates both the political and social histories of schooling." -David F. Labaree, Professor Emeritus, Stanford University School of Education, USA "A welcome and timely addition to our historical understanding of the interactions between school legislation and the emergence of modern school systems. Methodologically innovative in their use of new social, cultural and economic approaches, the authors of the different case studies challenge the reader to think comparatively and analytically about the acts, concepts and processes that underlay the rise of mass schooling in the West." -Rebecca E. Rogers, Professor in the History of Education,
This paper explores the evolution of the human capital gender gap in Liberal Italy (1871–1921). First, we show that Italy lagged some 50 years behind more advanced countries like France, Prussia and the UK, and that the regional divide in gendered literacy was unparalleled in the rest of Europe. Next, we test whether the shift to primary-school centralization in 1911 (the Daneo-Credaro Reform) brought about a decisive improvement in female literacy. We rely on a brand new, cross-sectional micro (municipal)-dataset of literacy rates in 1911 and 1921, as well as their potential determinants around 1911. Such data, combined with propensity score matching to improve identification, show that primary-school centralization increased the average annual growth of female literacy by 0.78 percentage points. Thus, even though the Reform did not aim at girls specifically, it brought about the unintended consequences of more rapid human capital accumulation for women and—ceteris paribus—a reduced educational gender gap. We briefly discuss why this “Silent Revolution” likely had important implications for Italy’s economic history.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.