Aim To objectively evaluate the postoperative face down posturing in macular hole surgery. Materials and Methods An electronic device called 'Maculog' was developed consisting of three basic components, a mercury switch triggered by the angle of tilt placed inside an earpiece, a data-recording device connected to the earpiece with cables and a windows based software program, specially written to analyse the recorded data in the form of tables and graphs. Ten patients undergoing macular hole surgery were fitted with the device on the first postoperative day before discharge. They were also asked for a subjective record of their posturing times. Four patients were given a posturing chair to take home. The device was retrieved after the first week and the data were downloaded to a PC for analysis. The actual posturing times recorded on the device were compared to the patients' own recollections. Results In all ten patients the actual posturing time was less than the time they had recorded themselves. The average actual posturing time was 48% of the perceived posturing time. The worst time for posturing, as expected, was between midnight and early morning. The compliance was better in patients who used the posturing chair. Conclusions It is feasible to quantify the time of posturing using an electronic device and computer analysis. The study has shown that the actual posturing time is significantly less than the perceived posturing time. A further large study using 'Maculog' is now planned to correlate actual posturing time to the results of macular hole surgery.
The Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer (Keeler Ltd, UK) is compared with the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Data from 80 eyes were acquired by four experienced observers. A linear regression analysis showed the relationship between the instruments to be: Pulsair = 0.66 + 0.95 Goldmann. Individual components of variation were analysed by analysis of variance which indicated a significant variation in the slope of the regression equation due to observers (p = 0.02) but not to the order in which topical anaesthesia was administered. Differences between two Pulsair instruments were of marginal significance (p = 0.07). The intercept of the regression equation was unaffected by any of the components of variation. Seventy-nine per cent of averaged intraocular pressure measurements obtained with the Pulsair 2000 fell on or within +/- 3 mmHg of those measured with the Goldmann tonometer. It is concluded that the Pulsair 2000 can provide clinically useful measurements of intraocular pressure.
SummaryReports of ocular damage from amniocentesis needles are rare. We report four cases of ocular perforation in which an amniocentesis needle may have been the cause and a proven case of central nervous system perforation during amniocentesis which resulted in hemianopia and gaze palsy. Ocular damage during amniocentesis may be commoner than the paucity of reports would suggest, and should be considered in all cases of congenital ocular conditions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.