2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digit Preference in Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: The Hedgehog Effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We speculated that this reflected a kind of GAT‐dial digit preference known as the ‘hedgehog effect’ (Buller et al. ) and that it might diminish the statistical power of the present study (Hessel ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We speculated that this reflected a kind of GAT‐dial digit preference known as the ‘hedgehog effect’ (Buller et al. ) and that it might diminish the statistical power of the present study (Hessel ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Additionally, a PTCH1 polymorphism was linked to increased breast cancer risk associated with oral contraceptive use [36]. More recently, comparative genomic hybridization analyses indicate that genomic loss at the PTCH1 locus was the fourth most commonly detected change among the tumor suppressor genes occurring in up to 19% of human breast cancers, and 33% of breast cancer cell lines [37]. With exhaustive sequencing efforts, three missense mutations in the Gli1 gene have been identified, but these mutations were carried in the heterozygous state, and have not yet been analyzed functionally [38].…”
Section: Hedgehog Signaling In Breast Cancer Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, many genes of Hh pathways are known oncogenes, including Gli1/2, Sonic Hedge-hog (Shh) and Smo, and Ptch1 can also be classified as a tumor suppressor. The Ptch1 locus is one of the most commonly detected changes among the tumor suppressor genes, which occur in about 19% of human breast cancers and in up to 33% of breast cancer cell lines [ 63 ]. Interestingly, the Gli1 expression is inversely associated with ER expression and Smo/Gli1 expression is significantly higher in the TNBC than non-TNBC forms [ 64 ].…”
Section: Mesenchymal Associated Tnbcmentioning
confidence: 99%