Forty out-patients affected by chronic tension-type headache were selected according to the diagnostic criteria of International Headache Society (IHS) Headache Classification Committee. In a controlled trial patients received placebo for a four-week baseline period, then they were randomized in double-blind fashion to therapy with mianserine (30-60 mg/day) of fluvoxamine (50-100 mg/day) for another eight-week period. Frequency of headache, pain severity and analgesic consumption were evaluated using a self-monitoring system. Mood depression was evaluated at 0, 4 and 8 weeks by using Zung's Self-Rating Depression Scale and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Both drugs were beneficial in the treatment of chronic tension-type headache. Non-depressed subjects with more severe headache responded best to fluvoxamine, whereas mianserine was more effective in the treatment of depressed patients with moderate headache. These results suggest that central serotoninergic neurotransmission can play a role in the pathophysiology of chronic tension-type headache also in non-depressed patients.
SUMMARYAim - We examined the effect of several clinical variables on the tendency to relapse and to require hospitalization in a cohort of patients, living in the community and followed up naturalistically for seven years. Method - Forty-six patients affected by schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, according to both DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria, were assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Life Skills Profile (LSP). All patients consecutively enrolled, were assessed in a stable clinical phase of illness and treated as usual by their reference psychiatrist. Social and clinical outcome was assessed yearly for seven years after the study entry and analyzed with survival analysis. Results - Patients who did not relapse, were characterized by higher functioning, lower positive symptoms, higher ability in self-care and non-turbulence and higher IQ at their baseline clinical evaluation. These variables were entered in a Cox regression model to corroborate the predictive power on the relapsing course of illness. Only IQ and non-turbulence scores of LSP were entered in the equation (Wald method: p=0.007 and p=0.002 respectively). Conclusions - Several factors interact with the course of illness and influence the tendency to require hospitalization. In the present study we report that non-turbulence is a significant predictor of a non-relapsing course of illness. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of other mediating variables.Declaration of Interest: none.
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out in 36 patients diagnosed as suffering from Generalized Anxiety Disorder with associated depressive symptoms to assess the efficacy and tolerability of two unitary doses of etizolam. After a 1-week wash-out period on placebo, patients were assigned at random to receive 1 tablet twice daily of either 0.50 mg or 0.25 mg etizolam or placebo for 5 weeks. Assessments were made at entry, on Day 21 and Day 35 of the patients' condition and symptoms using a battery of four psychometric tests (the Hamilton rating scales for anxiety and for depression, the Covi scale for anxiety and the Raskin scale for depression). Ten patients were withdrawn before the end of the study, 8 because of inadequate response (4 on placebo, 3 on 0.25 mg etizolam and 1 on 0.50 mg etizolam) in spite of dosage increase to 1 tablet 3-times daily, and 2 because of side-effects (both on 0.50 mg etizolam). Analysis of the results from the remaining 26 patients showed that, at the 0.50 mg dosage level, etizolam produced significant improvement in anxiety and depressive symptoms, particularly somatic manifestations, and was significantly more effective than placebo or the 0.25 dosage regimen. Etizolam was generally well tolerated and the few side-effects reported, mainly daytime drowsiness, were of mild to moderate severity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.