No abstract

PURPOSE:To present a review about a comparative study of bile duct ligation versus carbon tetrachloride Injection for inducing experimental liver cirrhosis. METHODS:This research was made through Medline/PubMed and SciELO web sites looking for papers on the content "induction of liver cirrhosis in rats". We have found 107 articles but only 30 were selected from 2004 to 2011. RESULTS:The most common methods used for inducing liver cirrhosis in the rat were administration of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) and bile duct ligation (BDL). CCl4 has induced cirrhosis from 36 hours to 18 weeks after injection and BDL from seven days to four weeks after surgery. CONCLUSION:For a safer inducing cirrhosis method BDL is better than CCl4 because of the absence of toxicity for researches and shorter time for achieving it.

-003. fgalvao@usp.br RESUMO OBJETIVOS. Analisar o conhecimento e a opinião de estudantes de medicina sobre doação e transplante de órgãos. MÉTODOS. Trezentos e quarenta e sete estudantes responderam, voluntariamente, questionário com 17 perguntas sobre doação e transplante de órgãos. Eles foram avaliados globalmente, para verificar tendências gerais, e agrupados de acordo com o seu ano no curso médico (primeiro ao sexto), para avaliar diferenças entre os períodos. Alunos do quinto e sexto ano foram reunidos em um só grupo. Os resultados foram analisados pelo teste Qui quadrado. RESULTADOS. A intenção de ser doador post mortem foi de 89% e intervivo de 90%, contudo, apenas 62% sabiam dos riscos da doação intervivo. Entre os 347 estudantes, 70% admitiram conhecimento regular, ruim ou péssimo do assunto, 90,2% consideraram importante o tema transplante para a graduação médica, 76,9% consideraram o consentimento informado/ expresso como o melhor critério de doação e 64,3% optaram pela gravidade da doença do paciente como melhor forma de alocação. O entendimento sobre transplante aumentou conforme o avanço no curso de graduação. Estudantes do quarto, quinto e sexto ano adotaram atitude negativa, em comparação aos dos anos iniciais, quanto à doação de órgãos para pacientes alcoólatras, não doadores, usuários de drogas ilícitas, estrangeiros e criminosos. CONCLUSÃO. Este trabalho demonstrou grande interesse e atitude positiva dos estudantes de medicina sobre doação e transplante de órgãos, embora a maioria tenha declarado conhecimento deficiente sobre o tema. Observamos também atitude negativa dos estudantes do quarto, quinto e sexto ano médico em relação à doação para alcoólatras, não doadores, usuários de drogas ilícitas, estrangeiros e criminosos. UNITERMOS: Doação de órgãos. Transplante. Estudantes de medicina. Conhecimentos. Atitudes. Ética. INTRODUÇÃOO transplante de órgãos no Brasil é atividade social, pois geralmente é custeado pelo sistema único de saúde (SUS) e depende da doação espontânea da população.Nos últimos anos, ocorreu aumento significativo no número de transplantes de órgãos em quase todos os estados da Federação, situando o Brasil entre os países que mais realizam transplante no mundo 1 . Contudo, a desinformação sobre temas básicos deste método terapêutico prejudica o seu desenvolvimento e provoca baixo índice de captação, má qualidade dos enxertos obtidos e interferência negativa nos resultados dos transplantes 1,2 . A educação médica é fator decisivo para o refinamento técnico do transplante e a melhora no índice de captação de órgãos 2-9 . A promoção de debates sobre transplante, envolvendo profissionais da saúde e sociedade em geral, é a melhor estratégia para aprimorar este procedimento e elevar sua discussão ética 2-5 . Existem na literatura médica evidências de conhecimento insuficiente dos médicos brasileiros sobre o tema transplante de órgãos, o que pode justificar o baixo nível de captação de órgãos em nosso meio 2,7,9 . Baseados nesta informação da literatura, presumimos que a desinform...

The impact of coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) in liver recipients remains largely unknown. Most data derive from small retrospective series of patients transplanted years ago. We aimed to report a single‐center case series of five consecutive patients in the early postoperative period of deceased‐donor liver transplantation who developed nosocomial COVID‐19. Two patients presented important respiratory discomfort and eventually died. One was 69 years old and had severe coronary disease. She rapidly worsened after COVID‐19 diagnosis on 9th postoperative day. The other was 67 years old with non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis, who experienced prolonged postoperative course, complicated with cytomegalovirus infection and kidney failure. He was diagnosed on 36th postoperative day and remained on mechanical ventilation for 20 days, ultimately succumbing of secondary bacterial infection. The third, fourth, and fifth patients were diagnosed on 10th, 11th, and 18th postoperative day, respectively, and presented satisfactory clinical evolution. These last two patients were severely immunosuppressed, since one underwent steroid bolus for acute cellular rejection and another also used anti‐thymocyte globulin for treating steroid‐resistant rejection. Our novel experience highlights that COVID‐19 may negatively impact the postoperative course, especially in elder and obese patients with comorbidities, and draws attention to COVID‐19 nosocomial spread in the early postoperative period.

Accurate knowledge of the anatomy of the bile ducts is critical for successfully hepato-biliary surgery. We describe the anatomical variations of the confluence of the bile ducts, their branches patterns, frequency and classification. From 1996 to 2011, we have collected data of the bile duct confluence. 2,032 and 1,014 anatomical variations of right and left bile ducts, respectively, were reviewed and classified according to the branching pattern. The frequencies of each type of the right hepatic duct (RHD) were as follows: Type A1-1,247 (61.3%); Type A2-296 (14.5%); Type A3-272 (13.3%); Type A4-124 (6.1%); Type A5-21 (1%) and others-72 (3.5%) and, for the left hepatic duct (LHD) was as follows: Type B1-773 (76.2%); Type B2-153 (15%); Type B3-38 (3.7%); Type B4-9 (0.8%); Type B5-29 (2.8%) and others-12 (1.1%). Atypical branching patterns of both the right and left hepatic ducts were found in 14 and 8%, respectively. The two most common variations of the RHD were right anterior and posterior hepatic ducts join together to form the RHD and trifurcation where the RHD is absent and right anterior and posterior hepatic ducts join directly to the confluence with the LHD to form the common hepatic duct. The two most common variations in the LHD were segment IV drainage to the left and right hepatic ducts.

Small bowel transplantation has advanced from an experimental strategy to a feasible alternative for patients with permanent intestinal failure. Further refinements in graft acceptance, immunosuppressive regiments, infection management and prophylaxis, surgical techniques as well as appropriated patient referral and selection are crucial to improve outcomes.

No abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Expanded donor criteria (marginal) grafts are an important solution for organ shortage. Nevertheless, they raise an ethical dilemma because they may increase the risk of transplant failure. This study compares the outcomes from marginal and non-marginal graft transplantation in 103 cases of liver transplantation due to chronic hepatic failure. DESIGN AND SETTING: One hundred and three consecutive liver transplantations to treat chronic liver disease performed in the Liver Transplantation Service of Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo between January 2001 and March 2006 were retrospectively analyzed. METHODS: We estimated graft quality according to a validated scoring system. We assessed the pre-transplantation liver disease category using the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), as low MELD (< 20) or high MELD (> 20). The parameters for marginal and non-marginal graft comparison were the one-week, one-month and one-year recipient survival rates, serum liver enzyme peak, post-transplantation hospital stay and incidence of surgical complications and retransplantation. The significance level was 0.05. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups regarding post-transplantation hospital stay, serum liver enzyme levels and surgical complications. In contrast, marginal grafts decreased overall recipient survival one month after transplantation. Furthermore, low-MELD recipients of non-marginal grafts showed better one-week and one-month survival than did high-MELD recipients of marginal livers. After the first month, patient survival was comparable in all groups up to one year. CONCLUSION: The use of marginal graft increases early mortality in liver transplantation, particularly among high-MELD recipients.