Background:The recycling of waste products into P fertilisers in agriculture is advisable from the perspective of sustainability. Bioeffectors (BEs), which have the ability to increase the plant uptake of P from recycled fertiliser products, may increase the fertiliser value of these products. This paper investigated the effect of a range of different recycled fertilisers on the growth and P uptake of wheat in pot experiments conducted at three different locations in Europe. Furthermore, investigations were undertaken as to whether the addition of a range of bioeffectors could significantly enhance P availability, P uptake and plant growth.Results: BE additions were found not to significantly increase the aboveground biomass of wheat plants or the uptake of P when plants were fertilised with recycled fertiliser products. This was shown across a range of pot experiments with soils of different P status. Only in the case of the positive control P fertiliser (TSP) was a positive effect of Proradix and RhizoVital on plant growth observed in one of the experiments, while in the same experiment RhizoVital and Biological fertiliser DC had a negative impact on plant biomass when the P fertiliser was Thomas phosphate. With regard to P uptake, there was only a slight positive effect of Proradix in plants not supplied with P fertiliser in this experiment. Clear differences were seen in the efficiency of P fertilisers. Generally, sewage sludge ash performed quite poorly (20-40 % of TSP), while sewage sludge, Thomas phosphate, P-enriched slag and the fibre fraction of pig manure all had a high availability of P (>74 % relative to TSP). Compost composed mainly of garden/park waste and sewage sludge was intermediate in availability (40-70 %). The elemental composition of the harvested wheat plants was significantly affected in all cases by the different P fertilisers added. The BE treatments significantly affected the elemental composition of the aboveground biomass in one of the experiments where the product Proradix had the greatest effect on elemental composition.
Conclusions:In conclusion, the experiments revealed a wide difference in the bioavailability of P in the different waste products, but the added microorganisms demonstrated a limited capacity to influence plant P uptake across a range of soils and waste products.
During past periods of advance, Arctic glaciers and ice sheets overrode soil, sediments, and vegetation and buried significant stores of organic matter (OM); these glaciers are now shrinking rapidly due to climate warming. Little is known about the biogeochemical processing of the OM buried beneath glacier ice which makes the processes associated with deglaciation difficult to predict. Subglacial sediments exposed at receding glacier fronts may represent a legacy of past biogeochemical processes. Here, we analyzed sediments from retreating fronts of 19 Arctic glaciers for their mineralogical and elemental composition, contents of major nutrients, OM biomarkers (aliphatic lipids and lignin‐derived phenols), 14C age, and microbial community structure. We show the character of the sediments is mostly determined by local glaciation history and bedrock lithology. Most subglacial sediments offer high amounts of readily bioavailable phosphorus (i.e., loose, labile, and Fe/Al P fractions) but lack readily accessible carbon substrates. The subglacial OM originated mainly from overridden terrestrial vascular plants. The results of OM biomarker analysis and 14C dating suggest the OM substrates degrade in the subglacial environment and are reworked by the resident microbial communities. We argue the biogeochemical legacy of the perishing subglacial environments is an important determinant for the early processes of proglacial ecological succession.
Among the possible methods for biomass ash (BA) utilization, land application represents an important nutrient‐saving approach of BA management. The land application of BA results in an increase of soil pH, but in contrast to conventional liming, ash application on agricultural land can supply additional nutrients to soil, such as K, Mg, or P. However, due to the complex mineral phase composition of ashes, release of nutrients from the ash matrix into soil solution is not well understood. In the presented pot experiment, two agricultural soils were amended using two common types of BA (wood and straw ash) at rate 1% (w/w). During the vegetation period of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), soil solution was sampled and monitored for the concentrations of Ca, K, Mg, and P. Subsequently, yield and nutrient uptake of wheat were determined. The effect of ash application on the investigated parameters differed substantially between the tested soils. Positive yield responses were found in soil with higher N content. Straw ash application increased concentrations of all monitored nutrients in soil solution but simultaneously increased plant uptake of K and P only. Wood ash increased concentrations of Ca and Mg in solution, while its effect on nutrient uptake strongly differed between soils. Generally, higher relative increases of nutrients in soil solution were surprisingly found in soil with higher pH and higher cation exchange capacity (CEC). Factors influencing dynamics of ash‐contained nutrients in soil solution are discussed.
Nutrient leaching from straw and wood ash matrix in soil‐plant conditions is investigated.
The influence of ashes on yield and nutrient uptake differed substantially depending on types of ash and soil.
Highly soluble K‐compounds in straw ash revealed by X‐ray powder diffraction.
Straw ash is a much more efficient P source than wood ash.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.