This paper is an attempt to handle pragmatic complexity within the framework of Natural Linguistics. Specifically it aims at building two naturalness scales of the complexity of pragmatic inferences based on the naturalness parameters of transparency-opacity and of biuniqueness-ambiguity, illustrated mainly with French examples. The scales are complementary: transparency-opacity deals with hierarchized meanings, biuniquenessambiguity with exclusive alternative meanings.Pragmatic complexity is intended here as a function of the number and types of inferences or inferential steps included in the description of an utterance meaning. It is defined quantitatively and qualitatively and converges with cognitive complexity. The scales distinguish phenomena that are to varying degrees opaque or ambiguous (indirect, elliptic or non-literal) according to whether there is flouting or violation of a Gricean maxim and how this takes place.The number of cotextual and/or contextual dimensions as well as variable cognitive operations, modes of reasoning and meaning relations are taken as measures of pragmatic complexity.The paper also discusses the relation between complexity and markedness. This issue reveals a conflict between the perspectives of speaker and hearer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.