The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has affected communities, populations, and countries throughout the world. As the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic developed, the extent to which the disease interacted with already existing endemic, non-communicable and infectious diseases became evident, hence deeply influencing health outcomes. Additionally, a synergistic effect has been demonstrated also with socio-economic, cultural, and contextual determinants of health which seem to contribute to poorer health and accumulating social disadvantages. In this essay, using as a starting point the syndemic theory that translates the cumulative and intertwined factors between different epidemics, we argue that the SARS-CoV-2 is a one health issue of a syndemic nature and that the failure to acknowledge this contributes to weakened policy-making processes and public health responses and ineffective health policies and programs.
ResumoEste ensaio tem por objetivo rever os diferentes elementos conceituais de equidade que foram se consolidando ao longo de tempo e a leitura que hoje se faz no Brasil de sua significação, orientada como um caminho para que se possa atingir um nível de garantia real e de fruição plena dos direitos à saúde, tendo-se sempre em mente a preocupação em compreender as diferenças, as necessidades e as particularidades dos distintos grupos sociais. Destaca a necessidade de se pensar a equidade em saúde como um processo em permanente transformação, que vai mudando seu escopo e abrangência à medida que certos resultados são alcançados e que novos desafios vão surgindo. Propõe que se deve avançar na discussão do tema, de modo a se estabelecer balizas seguras que resultem em práticas de promoção da equidade necessária à concretização do direito à saúde, capazes de produzir a melhoria objetiva de indicadores de saúde, bem como da percepção do cidadão com relação à satisfação com seu próprio estado de saúde, o de sua família e o da comunidade a que pertence. Assim sendo, o ideal de um sistema de saúde capaz de garantir o necessário a todos, levando-se em conta suas singularidades e necessidades, poderá ser atingido. Palavras-chave: Equidade; Equidade em Saúde; Sistema Único de Saúde.
Summary Background The COVID‐19 pandemic lead scientists and governmental authorities to issue clinical and public health recommendations based on progressively emerging evidence and expert opinions and many of these fast‐tracked to peer‐reviewed publications. Concerns were raised on scientific quality and generalizability of this emerging evidence. Main argument However, this way acting is not entirely new and often public health decisions are based on flawed and ambiguous evidence. Thus, to better guide decisions in these circumstances, in this article we argue that there is a need to follow fundamental principles in order to guide best public health practices. We purpose the usefulness of the framework of principalism in public which has been proved useful in real life conditions as a guide in the absence of reliable evidence. Conclusions It is recommended the implementation of these principles in an integrated manner adopting an holistic system approach to health policies adapted to specificities of local contexts.
The 69th World Health Assembly endorsed the Global Health Sector Strategy for Viral Hepatitis, embracing a goal to eliminate hepatitis infection as a public health threat by 2030. This was followed by the World Health Organization's (WHO) global targets for the care and management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. These announcements and targets were important in raising awareness and calling for action; however, tracking countries’ progress towards these elimination goals has provided insights to the limitations of these targets. The existing targets compare a country's progress relative to its 2015 values, penalizing countries who started their programmes prior to 2015, countries with a young population, or countries with a low prevalence. We recommend that (1) WHO simplify the hepatitis elimination targets, (2) change to absolute targets and (3) allow countries to achieve these disease targets with their own service coverage initiatives that will have the maximum impact. The recommended targets are as follows: reduce HCV new chronic cases to ≤5 per 100 000, reduce HBV prevalence among 1‐year‐olds to ≤0.1%, reduce HBV and HCV mortality to ≤5 per 100 000, and demonstrate HBV and HCV year‐to‐year decrease in new HCV‐ and HBV‐related HCC cases. The objective of our recommendations is not to lower expectations or diminish the hepatitis elimination standards, but to provide clearer targets that recognize the past and current elimination efforts by countries, help measure progress towards true elimination, and motivate other countries to follow suit.
RESUMO Artigo de revisão de literatura sobre a organização de serviços da Atenção Primária à Saúde em suas dimensões de acesso e equidade. Os artigos foram identificados nas bases de dados da Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde -Bireme). Palavras-chave: 'acesso aos serviços de saúde' e 'equidade'; período: 1993 a 2013. Dos 31 artigos encontrados, 29 estão em português, um em inglês e um em espanhol, publicados por 16 diferentes periódicos; 18 artigos (58,06%) referem-se à organização de serviços de saúde e 13 (41,94%) à equidade. A maioria (80,64%) utilizou abordagem qualitativa. Mais estudos são necessários a fim de avaliar se os sistemas de saúde tiveram impactos mensuráveis em termos de acesso e equidade.PALAVRAS-CHAVE Acesso aos serviços de saúde. Equidade. Atenção Primária à Saúde. Saúde -Bireme); Keywords: 'access to health services ' and 'equity'; period: 1993 to 2013. Of the 31 articles found, 29 are in portuguese, one in english and one in spanish, published by 16 different journals; 18 articles (58.06 %) ABSTRACT Literature review article on the organization of Primary Health Care services in its dimensions of access and equity. The articles were identified in the databases of the Virtual Health Library (Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development highlighted the growing attention to the adequacy of health planning models to sustainable development. A re‐reading of the results of a round table debate on “sustainable planning”, which took place at the 5th National Congress of Tropical Medicine (Portugal, 2019) under a participant observation strategy, framed by the findings of a “synthesis of better evidence” literature review and cross–referenced with the reflections of different authors and experts about the momentum created by the COVID–19 pandemic, underlined the challenges to sustainable health planning that have emerged and are projected beyond the current pandemic context. Variable perceptions of the term “sustainable health development”, leading to the potential loss of their relevance in guiding the elaboration of policies and strategic plans, and the potential higher effectiveness of the participatory approaches of health planning in achieving sustainable health were highlighted in the debate and literature, in general and in public health emergency contexts. Those results gained new relevance during the current COVID–19 pandemic, bringing back to the forefront a reflection of the inadequate planning framework that has usually been used to understand and respond to global health challenges, despite the already existing experience, evidence and support instruments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.