Periodontitis is a chronic multifactorial inflammatory disease associated with dysbiotic plaque biofilms and characterized by progressive destruction of the tooth-supporting apparatus which may result in tooth loss. In the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions, the lack of available evidence supporting the distinction between aggressive and chronic forms of periodontitis was highlighted. However, it was recognized that a substantial variation in terms of extent and
Background: Rate of progression of periodontitis has been used to inform the design
Within the limitations of the research, the data show that mean annual attachment level change varies considerably both within and between populations. Overall, the evidence does not support or refute the differentiation between forms of periodontal diseases based upon progression of attachment level change.
Aim To systematically review the literature to evaluate the recurrence of disease of people in long‐term supportive periodontal care (SPC), previously treated for periodontitis, and determine the effect of different methods of managing recurrence. The review focused on stage IV periodontitis. Materials and methods An electronic search was conducted (until May 2020) for prospective clinical trials. Tooth loss was the primary outcome. Results Twenty‐four publications were retrieved to address recurrence of disease in long‐term SPC. Eight studies were included in the meta‐analyses for tooth loss, and three studies for disease progression/recurrence (clinical attachment level [CAL] loss ≥2 mm). For patients in SPC of 5–20 years, prevalence of losing more than one tooth was 9.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5%–14%), while experiencing more than one site of CAL loss ≥2 mm was 24.8% (95% CI 11%–38%). Six studies informed on the effect of different methods of managing recurrence, with no clear evidence of superiority between methods. No data was found specifically for stage IV periodontitis. Conclusions A small proportion of patients with stage III/IV periodontitis will experience tooth loss in long‐term SPC (tendency for greater prevalence with time). Regular SPC appears to be important for reduction of tooth loss. No superior method to manage disease recurrence was found.
Current regenerative strategies for alveolar bone and periodontal tissues are effective and well adopted. These are mainly based on the use of a combination of synthetic/natural scaffolds and bioactive agents, obviating the incorporation of cells. However, there are some inherent limitations associated with traditional techniques, and we hypothesized that the use of cell-based therapies as part of comprehensive regenerative protocols may help overcome these hurdles to enhance clinical outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of human controlled clinical trials investigating the clinical and/or histological effect of the use of cellbased therapies for alveolar bone and periodontal regeneration and explored the translational potential of the different cell-based strategies identified in the included trials. A total of 16 studies (11 randomized controlled trials, 5 controlled clinical trials) were included for data synthesis and qualitative analysis with meta-analyses performed when appropriate. The results suggest a clinical benefit from the use of cell therapy. Improved outcomes were shown for alveolar ridge preservation, lateral ridge augmentation, and periodontal regeneration. However, there was insufficient evidence to identify best-performing treatment modalities amongst the different cell-based techniques. In light of the clinical and histological outcomes, we identify extraction socket and challenging lateral and vertical bone defects requiring bone block grafts as strong candidates for the adjuvant application of mesenchymal stem cells. Given the complexity, invasiveness, and costs associated with techniques that include "substantial manipulation" of tissues and cells, their additional clinical benefit when compared with "minimal manipulation" must be elucidated in future trials. STEM CELLS Cell-based therapies have the potential to improve outcomes of regenerative treatment in the oral cavity. Extraction sockets and challenging lateral/vertical bone defects requiring bone block grafts are ideal candidates for the adjuvant application of mesenchymal stem cells. The present review showed that there is insufficient evidence to identify best-performing treatment modalities among the different cell-based techniques. Given the complexity, invasiveness, and costs associated with the "substantial manipulation" of tissues and cells, the clinical benefit of these techniques when compared with "minimal manipulation" must be elucidated. Further research evaluating the effectiveness of simple, fast, and economical methods for cell harvesting and processing is warranted.
Purpose Periodontitis is the sixth most prevalent disease worldwide and periodontal bone loss (PBL) detection is crucial for its early recognition and establishment of the correct diagnosis and prognosis. Current radiographic assessment by clinicians exhibits substantial interobserver variation. Computer-assisted radiographic assessment can calculate bone loss objectively and aid in early bone loss detection. Understanding the rate of disease progression can guide the choice of treatment and lead to early initiation of periodontal therapy. Methodology We propose an end-to-end system that includes a deep neural network with hourglass architecture to predict dental landmarks in single, double and triple rooted teeth using periapical radiographs. We then estimate the PBL and disease severity stage using the predicted landmarks. We also introduce a novel adaptation of MixUp data augmentation that improves the landmark localisation. Results We evaluate the proposed system using cross-validation on 340 radiographs from 63 patient cases containing 463, 115 and 56 single, double and triple rooted teeth. The landmark localisation achieved Percentage Correct Keypoints (PCK) of 88.9%, 73.9% and 74.4%, respectively, and a combined PCK of 83.3% across all root morphologies, outperforming the next best architecture by 1.7%. When compared to clinicians’ visual evaluations of full radiographs, the average PBL error was 10.69%, with a severity stage accuracy of 58%. This simulates current interobserver variation, implying that diverse data could improve accuracy. Conclusions The system showed a promising capability to localise landmarks and estimate periodontal bone loss on periapical radiographs. An agreement was found with other literature that non-CEJ (Cemento-Enamel Junction) landmarks are the hardest to localise. Honing the system’s clinical pipeline will allow for its use in intervention applications.
Aim:To investigate whether periodontitis is associated with amyloid beta (Aβ) peptides and whether systemic inflammation could act as a potential mediator of this link. Materials and Methods:A case-control study was designed including 75 patients with periodontitis (cases) and 75 age-balanced and gender-matched participants without periodontitis (controls). Full-mouth periodontal evaluation was performed in all participants. Demographic, clinical and behaviour data were also recorded. Fasting blood samples were collected, and serum levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), Aβ 1-40 and Aβ 1-42 were determined.Results: Cases showed higher levels of IL-6 (8.7 ± 3.2 vs. 4.8 ± 0.5 pg/ml), hs-CRP (3.3 ± 1.2 vs. 0.9 ± 0.7 mg/L), Aβ 1-40 (37.3 ± 6.0 vs. 30.3 ± 1.8 pg/ml) and Aβ 1-42 (54.5 ± 10.6 vs. 36.5 ± 10.0 pg/ml) when compared to controls (all p < .001). Diagnosis of periodontitis was statistically significantly associated with cir-culating Aβ 1-40 ( coefficient adjusted = 6.9, 95% CI: 5.4-8.3; p < .001) and Aβ ( coefficient adjusted = 17.8, 95% CI: 14.4-21.3; p < .001). Mediation analysis confirmed hs-CRP and IL-6 as mediators of this association. Conclusions:Periodontitis is associated with increased peripheral levels of Aβ. This finding could be explained by enhanced systemic inflammation that can be seen in patients with periodontitis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.