Purpose To document the characteristics, treatments, and anatomical and functional outcomes of patients with ocular trauma from improvised explosive devices (IEDs). Methods Retrospective review of ocular injuries caused by IEDs, admitted to our tertiary referral centre. Results In total, sixty-one eyes of the 39 patients with an average age of 24 years (range, 20-42 years) were included in the study. In total, 49 (80%) eyes of the patients had open-globe and 12 (20%) had closed-globe injury.In eyes with open-globe injury, intraocular foreign body (IOFB) injury was the most frequently encountered type of injury, observed in 76% of eyes. Evisceration or enucleation was required as a primary surgical intervention in 17 (28%) of the eyes. Twentytwo (36%) eyes had no light perception at presentation. Patients were followed up for an average of 6 months (range, 4-34 months). At the last follow-up, 26 (43%) of 61 eyes had no light perception. Postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) developed in 12 (50%) of the 24 eyes that underwent vitreoretinal surgery, and four of these eyes became phthisical. There were no cases of endophthalmitis. The presence of open-globe injury and presenting visual acuity worse than 5/200 were significantly associated with poor visual outcome (o5/200, Po0.05).In eyes with open-globe injury, the presence of an IOFB was not associated with poor visual outcome (P40.05). Conclusion Ocular injuries from IEDs are highly associated with severe ocular damage requiring extensive surgical repair or evisceration/enucleation. Postoperative PVR is a common cause of poor anatomical and visual outcome.

Objectives:To investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone (OZURDEX®) implantation in patients with recalcitrant diabetic macular edema.Materials and Methods:This is a retrospective non-randomized study of patients who underwent intravitreal dexamethasone implantation for recalcitrant diabetic macular edema. Main outcome measures included changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and incidence of ocular side effects.Results:Fifty-seven eyes of thirty-eight patients (20 females, 18 males; mean age 65±7 years) were included in the study. The mean hemoglobin A1c level was 7.9±1.7%. Before entering the study, patients had undergone 5.71±3.40 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and 3.44±2.46 intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injections. The mean duration of diabetes and diabetic macular edema was 17.2±6.4 years and 60.2±17.6 months, respectively. At baseline, mean CMT was 506.76±166.74 µm, and the mean BCVA was 0.68±0.38 LogMAR. Mean CMT significantly decreased to 341.36±146.26 µm (p<0.001), 324.41±114.58 µm (p<0.001), and 384.82±151 µm (p<0.001) at 1, 3, and 4 months of follow-up and increased again to 462.29±152.87 µm at 5 months. Sixteen eyes (28%) received second injections after mean of 7.4±2.3 months and mean CMT was again significantly decreased at 7, 8, and 9 months. Significant improvement in mean BCVA (0.54±0.41 LogMAR; p<0.001) occurred only at 1 month after implantation. However, subgroup analysis revealed significant BCVA improvement in the pseudophakic group at 1, 3, and 4 months. Among phakic patients, 50% showed cataract progression and 28% had elevated intraocular pressure increase which was managed medically.Conclusion:Intravitreal dexamethasone implantation was effective for the first 4 months in eyes with recalcitrant diabetic macular edema. However, it is hard to displace anti-VEGF agents as first-line therapy due to steroid-related complications.

PurposeThis study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) and intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in the treatment of macular edema related to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), using the new optical coherence tomography parameters.Material and methodsThe medical records of 62 patients (IVTA n=26; IVB n=36) with macular edema secondary to BRVO and at least 12 months follow-up between 2007 and 2011 were evaluated by within-group and inter-group comparisons.ResultsBoth groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics (P>0.05). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement and central subfoveal thickness (CST) reduction were significantly higher in the IVTA group at only the third month (P<0.05). In nonischemic BRVO, while BCVA improvement was significantly higher in the IVTA group at the third and sixth months (P<0.05), no significant difference was found in CST reduction at all visits (P>0.05). In ischemic BRVO, no significant difference was found in BCVA improvement at all visits, but CST reduction was significantly higher in the IVTA group at the first and third months. Logarithmic optical coherence tomography change (LogOCTc) and relative change in retinal thickness (RCRT) showed the same levels of significance in the comparisons. Relative change in retinal thickening (RCRTing) was more valuable compared to the other parameters in the subgroup analyses.ConclusionThere was no difference between groups at the 12th month. IVTA was more efficient than IVB in regard to BCVA improvement in nonischemic BRVO in the early follow-up. IVTA made significant retinal thinning compared to IVB in ischemic BRVO in the early period. RCRTing and LogOCTc are important parameters used to monitor the response to treatment in BRVO. Because of the similar levels of significance, RCRT and LogOCTc can be used interchangeably.

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Screening for thrombophilic mutations such as MTHFR C677T, factor V Leiden, and prothrombin G20210A in RVO patients at all ages seems to be unnecessary and not cost-effective. However, thrombophilic disorders should be screened selectively, focusing on young individuals, especially with bilateral involvement, without additional cardiovascular risk factors, or a family history of thrombosis.

A 49-year-old woman with a diagnosis of diabetic cystoid macular edema in both eyes presented with the appearance of a macular hole in the left eye 1 month after intravitreal bevacizumab injection. Optical coherence tomography demonstrated a lamellar macular hole in the left eye. Although vitreomacular traction and epiretinal membrane are the possible underlying causes for the development of lamellar macular hole formation in eyes with cystoid macular edema, in this case previous optical coherence tomography scans revealed the complete separation of the posterior hyaloid membrane and the absence of an epiretinal membrane. The exact mechanism involved in the progression of cystoid macular edema to lamellar macular hole and the contribution of the intravitreal bevacizumab injections to this transformation remain unclear.

Purpose To evaluate the clinical features, and anatomical and visual outcomes in patients with closed-globe contusion injury involving the posterior segment. Methods Retrospective review of posterior segment contusion injuries admitted to our tertiary referral center.

Treatment with IVTA injections seems to be more effective in improving best-corrected visual acuity during the early postinjection period in patients with ischemic CRVO, and in decreasing central subfoveal thickness in patients with nonischemic CRVO. However, higher intraocular pressure and development of glaucoma and cataracts must be considered seriously in patients with CRVO who receive IVTA injections. Change in logOCT may be used to monitor patient response to treatments for CRVO-related ME.