This study aims to review and analyze the policy of controlling fake news or hoaxes and expressions of hatred based on Law Number 11 which has been changed to Act Number 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transctions as well as several other provisions. This research method is a qualitative research method by analyzing a statutory regulation. Besides that, it also examines the sources of textbooks, journal books in the library to support data and information in analyzing. The results of this study indicate that the basic policy regarding the dissemination of false news or hoaxes and hate speech that has been regulated in Law Number 19 Year 2016 article 28 paragraphs 1 and 2 has been effective because it can limit the space for the perpetrators of hoaks and hate speech. More specifically, the perpetrators can be charged with other related articles namely article 311 and 378 of the Criminal Code, Article 27 paragraph 3 of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, Law No. 40 of 2008 concerning the Elimination of Racial and Ethnic Discrimination, as well as the perpetrators of spreading false news may also be subject to articles related to hate speech. Besides that, the more rapid and development of digital technology today, the more diverse the new crimes committed through this digital media, in this case the spread of false news (Hoax) that is rife. As many as 800,000 sites in Indonesia have been indicated as spreading false information.
This article discusses the architectural history of Rumah Bolon in Pematang Purba Village, Simalungun Regency. Rumah Bolon is a typical Batak traditional house which is usually the residence of the king and his entire extended family. This research uses qualitative research methods, with a historical approach. In the historical approach, there are four writing steps, namely: heuristics, verification or criticism, interpretation, and historiography. Bolon's house is a symbol of the greatness and beauty of Simalungun's distinctive architecture. In its construction, it must go through various kinds of long and strict ceremonies. Not all wood can also be used as raw material for dast in its manufacture. In the Rumah Bolon architecture, the design from top to bottom, has been arranged in great detail. In addition, in the Rumah Bolon building there are also Simalungun colors; red; white; and black. There are also several carvings in Rumah Bolon that symbolize the meanings of greatness, mutual cooperation, and togetherness.
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji penerapan pembuktian terbalik dalam Undang-undang tindak pidana pencucian uang di Kota Medan. Masalah pencucian uang ini difokuskan kepada kajian yuridis tentang proses pembuktian terbalik di pengadilan. Guna menganalisis masalah ini peneliti mengacu pada Pasal 77 dan Pasal 78 Undang-undang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dan menggunakan metode penelitian empiris normatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan tahapan wawancara, observasi dan kajian literatur. Kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa penerapan hukum tentang pembuktian terbalik dalam tindak kejahatan pencucian uang sudah dijalankan sesuai dengan Pasal 77 dan Pasal 78, dengan beban pembuktian yang dibebankan kepada terdakwa. Pembuktian harus dilakukan oleh terdakwa berupa penjelasan asal usul harta kekayaan yang tidak berasal dari hasil dari tindak pidana dan perbuatan haram seperti yang termaktub dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-undang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Penerapan Pasal 183 KUHAP yang mengatur tentang penentuan pidana bagi terdakwa apabila didapati bukti kesalahan minimal ada dua alat bukti ditambah dengan keyakinan hakim bahwa tindak pidana benar-benar terjadi. Oleh sebab itu, penerapan pembuktian terbalik merujuk kepada pada UU No. 8 tahun 2010 bersifat keharusan bagi terdakwa untuk membuktikan bahwa harta kekayaannya tidak berasal dari kejahatan.
Introduction: Law enforcement and protection for cyber cases is focused on consumers as victims of digital crimes where consumers are generally harmed when conducting business transactions digitally. Where the focus of this paper discusses the legal protection of victims of cybercrime victims when transacting business.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to explain the concept of cybercrime in financial transactions.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative legal research with a statute legal approach and a conceptual approach.Results of the Research: Cyber crime is currently very growing in Indonesia, especially in the current era of digitalization. Where the law can protect from new crimes that live in the current kekininia period so that victims of cyber crime legally in Indonesia can be implemented in accordance with its purpose, which is to protect all Indonesian people from crime cases.
ABSTRAK Penyelesaian sengketa pada kondisi fore majeure akibat pandemic covid-19 merupakan suatu permohonan debitur untuk menunjukkan bahwa tidak dapat dilaksanakan apa yang sebelumnya telah dijanjikan karena disebabkan oleh hal-hal yang sama sekali tidak terduga atau situasi yang tidak diprediksi sebelumnya. Maka akibat hukumnya yang terdapat pada force majeure si berpiutang tidak bisa membebankan resiko yang didapatnya kepada si berutang dan si berutang tidak bisa juga dinyatakan lalai dalam kewajibanpemenuhan prestasi. Maka, akibat dari kasus covid-19 situasi force majeure sebagai jalan alternatife untuk menyelesaikan persoalan. Maka kasus wanprestasi ditempuh melalui jalur non-litigasi melalui mediasi, arbitrase dan negosiasi sebagai penyelesaian sengketa. Jalur ini ditempuh disebabkan situasi yang memaksa sementara wanprestasi merupakan sebuah perjanjian yang telah disepakati diawal oleh kedua belah pihak. ABSTRACT Settlement of disputes in fore majeure conditions due to the covid-19 pandeic is a request from the debtor to show that what was previously promised cannot be carried out because it is caused by completely unexpected things or situations that were not previously predicted. So the legal consequences contained in the force majeure of the debtor cannot also be declared negligent in the obligation to fulfill performance. So, as a result of the Covid-19 case, the force majeur situations is an alternative a way to solve the problem. So the case of default is pursued through non-litigation channels through mediation, arbitration and negotiaton as dispute resolution. This path was taken due to a compelling situation while the default was an agreement that had been agreed in advance by both parties.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.