as expected, fall beloxi the present data T h e measured and calculated data for the investigation are reported in Tables I and 11. T h e standard deviation between k , ellcc, and k , exptl was 0.31 and the average per cent error based upon k, ex,,tl wds 9 4%.Some of this variation can be attributed to error resulting from the calculation of t l T h e results of the study presented as dimensionless J factor correlations suggest that the analogy holds reasonably well for flo\v transverse to vertical tubes in a bundle Nomenclature C = specific heat of mixture, B.t.u./lb. F. do = diameter of tubes, ft. D, = diffusion coefficient, sq. ft. 'hr. G = mass flow rate of mixture, lb.!'hr, sq. ft. min. cross GM = molar flow rate. lb. mole,'hr. sq. ft. min. cross section h, = gas film heat transfer coefficient, B.t.u./hr. sq. ft. F. h,' = total heat transfer coefficient less that provided by gas J o = diffusion J factor J H k = thermal conductivity of mixture, B.t.u.;'hr. sq. ft. k , = mass transfer coefficient! lb. molejhr. sq. ft. a t m . M , = molecular Iveight of vapor, Ib./mole section film, B.t.u./'hr. sq. f t . F. = heat transfer J factor ' F.:'ft. pBJf = mean partial pressure of noncondensable, atm.pt = partial pressure of vapor a t interface, a t m . p,, = partial pressure of vapor in bulk stream, atm.
t,= temperature of bulk stream, ' F. t i = temperature of liquid-gas interface, ' F.