In acromegaly, quality of life, status of depression and satisfaction of the subjects with their treatment are intercorrelated.

Introduction The aim of this study was to analyze the available literature by conducting a systematic review to assess the possible effects of nerve‐sparing segmental resection and conventional bowel resection on postoperative complications for the treatment of colorectal endometriosis. Material and methods Pubmed, Clinical http://trials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched from 1997 to 2021 in order to perform a systematic review. Studies including patients undergoing segmental resection for colorectal endometriosis including adequate follow‐up, data on postoperative complications and postoperative sequelae were enrolled in this review. Selected articles were evaluated and divided in two groups: Nerve‐sparing resection (NSR), and conventional segmental resection not otherwise specified (SRNOS). Within the NSRs, studies mentioning preservation of the rectal artery supply (artery and nerve‐sparing SR – ANSR) and not reporting preservation of the artery supply (NSR not otherwise specified – NSRNOS) were further analyzed. PROSPERO ID: CRD42021250974. Results A total of 7549 patients from 63 studies were included in the data analysis. Forty‐three of these publications did not mention the preservation or the removal of the hypogastric nerve plexus, or main rectal artery supply and were summarized as SRNOS. The remaining 22 studies were listed under the NSR group. The mean size of the resected deep endometriosis lesions and patients’ body mass index were comparable between SRNOS and NSR. A mean of 3.6% (0–16.6) and 2.3% (0–10.5%) of rectovaginal fistula development was reported in patients who underwent SRNOS and NSR, respectively. Anastomotic leakage rates varied from 0% to 8.6% (mean 1.7 ± 2%) in SRNOS compared with 0% to 8% (mean 1.7 ± 2%) in patients undergoing NSR. Urinary retention (4.5% and 4.9%) and long‐term bladder catheterization (4.9% and 5.6%) were frequently reported in SRNOS and NSR. There was insufficient information about pain or the recurrence rates for women undergoing SRNOS and NSR. Conclusions Current data describe the outcomes of different segmental resection techniques. However, the data are inhomogeneous and not sufficient to reach a conclusion regarding a possible advantage of one technique over the other.

Introduction The aim of this study was to investigate long‐term outcomes in terms of pain, quality of life (QoL), and gastrointestinal symptoms in women following colorectal surgery for deep endometriosis. Material and methods In this historical cohort, women who underwent surgical treatment for deep endometriosis by either nerve‐sparing full‐thickness discoid resection (DR) or colorectal segmental resection (SR) between March 2011 and August 2016 were re‐evaluated through telephone interviews about their long‐term pain symptoms, subjective overall QoL as rated using a score from 0 (worst) to 10 (optimal), and gastrointestinal outcomes reflected by lower anterior resection syndrome (LARS) following a first postsurgical evaluation (visit 1) published previously and a long‐term follow‐up evaluation (visit 2). Results The median long‐term follow‐up time was 35.4 months at visit 1 and 86 months at visit 2. Of 134 patients, 77 were eligible for final analysis and 57 were lost to follow‐up. Compared with presurgical values, QoL scores were significantly increased at both postsurgical evaluation visits in both the SR cohort (scores of 3, 8.5, and 10 at the presurgical visit, visit 1, and visit 2, respectively; p < 0.001) and the DR cohort (scores of 3, 9, and 10, respectively; p < 0.001). Pain scores for dysmenorrhea (SR group scores of 8, 2, and 2, respectively; p < 0.001; DR group scores of 9, 2, and 1, respectively; p < 0.001), dyspareunia (SR group scores of 4, 0, and 0, respectively; p < 0.001; DR group scores of 5, 0, and 1, respectively; p = 0.003), and dyschezia (SR group scores of 8, 2, and 2, respectively; p < 0.001; DR group scores of 9, 2, and 1, respectively; p < 0.001) significantly decreased after surgery and remained stable in both cohorts over the follow‐up period. Minor and major LARS, reflecting gastrointestinal function, was observed in 6.5% and 8.1% of the SR group and in 13.3% and 6.7% of the DR group, respectively, at visit 1 and in 3.2% and 3.2% of the SR group and 0% and 0% of the DR group, respectively, at visit 2, without significant differences between the SR and DR groups. Conclusions Colorectal surgery for deep endometriosis, either by DR or SR, provides stable and long‐term pain relief with low rates of permanent gastrointestinal function impairment.

Our data showed that among some sonographic findings of abnormal placentation, smallest myometrial thickness was a significant predictor to determine candidates for conservative approach.