This article describes the impact of digital literacy on the professional environment, which allows people to create and share digital content. It also describes how digital literacy can be used communicate and solve problems for effective and creative selfrealization in education, work and social. There are 3 models of digital skills that are largely mutually complementary: DigCompEdu 2018, EU DigComp and Target Competency Model 2025. These models describes changes in the working conditions and requirements for the employee in the context of digitalization. New technologies in teaching digital skills that are continuous, social, personalized and focused on the needs and interests of the students are proposed. The combination of various educational technologies, training formats and technical innovations into a single educational system has also been justified. The improvement in the quality of digital education is due to better data analysis and forecasting, the development and the launch of advanced 56
The article substantiates the relevance of a scientific insight g of those changes in the activities of companies that are observed in the formation of human capital in enterprises of the IT industry. The article highlights the position of digital transformation in accordance with which the conditions for the use of human capital, which is perceived as a combination of knowledge, skills, experience, motivation, health, creative and entrepreneurial abilities of a person, contributing to the increase of his income. During introducing the concept of lifelong learning, it becomes possible to use human capital effectively in terms of both technology and income. As a result of research conducted by domestic and foreign scientists, it was proposed to expand the concept of “human capital” by adding the “entrepreneurial ability” component. Only the introduction of employee abilities, using, and the application of innovations in their work have a decisive impact on the performance of both an individual enterprise and society as a whole, the development of an innovative economy, the acceleration of the pace of scientific and technological progress and the implementation of the concept of sustainable development of an enterprise. For in-depth analysis, it was proposed two initial linear models, the first includes quantitative and qualitative variables. Based on the available statistical data, empirical profiles of the dependence of wages on the level of education are formed, which will give some idea of the demand for labor with a certain level of education in the labor market
The role of the state in the processes of European integration and decentralization is analyzed, the factors of threats for it are determined. The fol- lowing common features of decentralization processes in the EU member states are highlighted as strengthening the role of the regional level, the need to choose between different models of separation of powers between different levels of go- vernment (exclusive or joint authority) and the search for ways to adequately fi- nance transferred powers. Decentralization also actualizes the problem of territo- rial inequality and patronage for European countries. It is proved that the national state is a central actor in the process of decentralization, despite the fact that this process creates certain threats to the state itself. On the one hand, the EU as a supranational organization has already limited some aspects of the sovereignty of its member states, in particular, in the area of monetary policy. With the deepening of European integration, the powers of national states and in other areas are in- creasingly limited. On the other hand, the gradual increase in the share of powers conveyed by the state to decentralized and regional authorities further weakens its role. Moreover, the increasing influence of liberalism on state policy and the introduction of competition among the main providers of public services also li- mits the possibility of the state’s influence on its internal policies. Such a dynamics gives grounds for questioning the ability of states to effectively manage their ter- ritories. At the same time, it was noted that in most EU member states, the bodies of state power have long been the guarantor of national unity in both social and territorial terms. Such a “unity of opposites” (decentralization and centralization) is unlikely to change in the medium term.
Карташов Євген Григорович, доктор наук з державного управління, завідувач кафедри публічного управління і проектного менеджменту Навчально-наукового інституту менеджменту та психології ДЗВО «Університет менеджменту освіти».
The role of the state in the processes of European integration and decentralization is analyzed, the factors of threats for it are determined. The following common features of decentralization processes in the EU member states are highlighted as strengthening the role of the regional level, the need to choose between different models of separation of powers between different levels of government (exclusive or joint authority) and the search for ways to adequately finance transferred powers. Decentralization also actualizes the problem of territorial inequality and patronage for European countries. It is proved that the national state is a central actor in the process of decentralization, despite the fact that this process creates certain threats to the state itself. On the one hand, the EU as a supranational organization has already limited some aspects of the sovereignty of its member states, in particular, in the area of monetary policy. With the deepening of European integration, the powers of national states and in other areas are increasingly limited. On the other hand, the gradual increase in the share of powers conveyed by the state to decentralized and regional authorities further weakens its role. Moreover, the increasing influence of liberalism on state policy and the introduction of competition among the main providers of public services also limits the possibility of the state’s influence on its internal policies. Such a dynamics gives grounds for questioning the ability of states to effectively manage their territories. At the same time, it was noted that in most EU member states, the bodies of state power have long been the guarantor of national unity in both social and territorial terms. Such a “unity of opposites” (decentralization and centralization) is unlikely to change in the medium term.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.