This paper adopts an internet-based experiment to investigate whether and how individual donors use nonprofit organizations' financial and nonfinancial information when making their donation decisions. Using undergraduate students in the United States (US) to proxy for individual donors, our results indicate that individual donors are more likely to acquire nonfinancial information, such as nonprofit organizations' goals, outcomes, programs and missions, than financial information. Donors integrate nonfinancial information into their decisions as their actual donations are significantly correlated with such information. Our results also indicate that while individual donors acquire financial efficiency measures, including the program expense ratio and fundraising expense ratio, they do not seem to integrate such information into their decisions as their actual donations are not significantly correlated with the efficiency information. This study contributes to the nonprofit literature and research domain focusing on charitable giving and donor preferences.
SYNOPSIS
This study examines whether and how a nonprofit organization's financial efficiency and its solicitation type—namely, whether it allows donors the ability to restrict contributions to their preferred choices—influence individual donations. We find that a nonprofit organization's financial efficiency indirectly influences individual donations through its effect on donors' confidence. We also find that a nonprofit organization receives significantly more donations when it allows donors to restrict donations to their preferred choices than when it does not. This positive effect is greater when the organization reports low efficiency than when it reports high efficiency. Thus, allowing the restriction of donations not only influences individual donations directly, but also compensates for the effect of low efficiency on donations.
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; mso-pagination: none;"><em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">In this paper, I describe an assignment designed to give students an intermediate level of understanding of the causes of the crisis using online educational resources widely available on the internet.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I implemented the assignment in an undergraduate intermediate accounting course.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Feedback from students indicate the assignment enhanced their learning of basic financial literacy concepts, encouraged them to make links between significant economic events and accounting concepts, and increased their confidence in their ability to learn difficult concepts on their own.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></em></p>
Contributing to the expanding examination of the accounting policies that facilitated slavery's persistence in the United States, this study examines the Gradual Abolition Act of 1804 of New Jersey, the last Northern state to emancipate enslaved humans. New Jersey's Act included a provision for payments to white ‘masters’ for the care of children born after the Act to mothers who were – and remained – enslaved. These payments were considered a form of ‘compensated abolition’ and were included in the Act because prior efforts to persuade enslavers in New Jersey to agree to an eventual end to human enslavement had failed. With a focus on the children in Montgomery Township, this article investigates how the State of New Jersey disbursed the funds for this provision, and expands on previous research on the role of accounting for slavery by examining the crucial role states – including Northern states that are often overlooked in studies of United States' slavery – played in perpetuating this brutal system.
Tax strategy patents (TSPs) are currently the center of debate due to their potential to monopolize interpretations of the tax code. Current legislative efforts to calm the debate surrounding tax strategy patents fail to do so. This paper analyzes current legislative reform measures aimed at TSPs. We identify both administrative and legislative problems surrounding TSPs, and argue that legislative reform that completely removes legal methods from patentable subject matter is critically necessary in order to provide equity for all taxpayers. Despite proposed legislation to curb the growth of TSPs, more stringent legislative and administrative reform is necessary in order to provide guidance to taxpayers and to advance tax policy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.