Recent studies have demonstrated that people inflict self-punishment after unintentionally making an unfair allocation decision. The present study examined whether or not the unfair allocation decision would also prompt participants to make a charitable donation. The results indicated that participants who unintentionally made an unfair allocation decision donated a greater amount of money than those who made a fair allocation decision. In addition, the amount of money that participants donated was positively correlated with their sense of guilt (“zaiakukan” in Japanese) caused by their unfair allocation. Therefore, these results suggest that those who feel guilty (or possibly shame) due to their unintentional transgression would use charitable donation as a means to alleviate the aversive feeling.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.