SUMMARY
Confidence judgments are a central example of metacognition—knowledge about one’s own cognitive processes. According to this metacognitive view, confidence reports are generated by a second-order monitoring process based on the quality of internal representations about beliefs. Although neural correlates of decision confidence have been recently identified in humans and other animals, it is not well understood whether there are brain areas specifically important for confidence monitoring. To address this issue, we designed a postdecision temporal wagering task in which rats expressed choice confidence by the amount of time they were willing to wait for reward. We found that orbitofrontal cortex inactivation disrupts waiting-based confidence reports without affecting decision accuracy. Furthermore, we show that a normative model can quantitatively account for waiting times based on the computation of decision confidence. These results establish an anatomical locus for a metacognitive report, confidence judgment, distinct from the processes required for perceptual decisions.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can present with abdominal pain in children and adults. Most imaging findings have been limited to characteristic lung findings, as well as one report of bowel-ischemia-related findings in adults. We report a case of COVID-19 in a healthy teenager who initially presented with isolated mesenteric adenopathy, typically a self-limited illness, which progressed to severe illness requiring intensive care before complete recovery. The boy tested negative for COVID-19 twice by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from upper respiratory swabs before sputum PCR resulted positive. A high index of suspicion should be maintained for COVID-19 given the continued emergence of new manifestations of the disease.
Purpose
While full description of pediatric COVID-19 manifestations is evolving, children appear to present less frequently, and often display a less severe disease phenotype. There is correspondingly less data regarding pediatric radiologic findings. To describe the imaging findings of pediatric COVID-19, we evaluated the radiologic imaging of the initial patient cohort identified at our institution.
Methods
In this IRB approved study, all patients at our institution aged 0–21 with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) based on PCR or immunoglobulin testing were identified. Imaging was reviewed by the co-authors and presence of abnormalities determined by consensus. Pre-existing comorbidities and alternative diagnoses were recorded. Rates of each finding were calculated. Findings were compared to published data following review of the available literature.
Results
Out of 130 Covid-19 positive patients, 24 patients underwent imaging, including 21 chest radiographs and 4 chest CT scans. Chest x-rays were normal in 33%. Patchy or streaky opacities were the most common radiographic abnormality, each seen in 38% of patients. CT findings included ill-defined or geographic ground glass opacities, dense opacities, septal thickening and crazy paving, and small pleural effusions. Results are similar to those reported in adults. Multiple COVID-19 positive children presented for symptoms due to an additional acute illness, including appendicitis and urinary infection.
Conclusions
Radiologic findings of COVID-19 in pediatric patients range from normal to severe ARDS type appearance. During this ongoing pandemic, these radiographic signs can be useful for the evaluation of disease status and guiding care, particularly in those with comorbidities.
Precis
Radiologic findings of COVID-19 in pediatric patients are similar to those seen in adults, and may range from normal to severe ARDS type appearance.
Pediatric radiology is an immensely rewarding career choice. Eight pediatric radiologists, enthusiastic for their profession, were asked six questions about their career choice. Their responses illustrate the common virtues of pediatric radiology and also demonstrate the diverse paths and activities that pediatric radiologists take and pursue.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.