Key points• Control of regional cardiac function, as mediated by the intrinsic cardiac (IC) nervous system, is dependent upon its cardiac afferent neuronal inputs, changes in its central neuronal drive and interactions mediated within via local circuit neurons.• The majority of its local circuit neurons receive indirect central (sympathetic and parasympathetic) inputs, lesser proportions transducing the cardiac milieu.• Fifty per cent of IC neurons exhibit cardiac cycle-related periodicity that is primarily related to direct cardiac mechano-sensory afferent inputs and, secondarily, to indirect central autonomic efferent inputs.• In response to mediastinal nerve stimulation, most IC neurons became excessively activated in the induction of atrial arrhythmias such that their stochastic interactivity precedes and persists throughout neuronally induced atrial fibrillation.• Modulation of such stochastic IC local circuit neuronal recruitment may represent a novel target for the treatment of select cardiac disease, including atrial arrhythmias.Abstract The aims of the study were to determine how aggregates of intrinsic cardiac (IC) neurons transduce the cardiovascular milieu versus responding to changes in central neuronal drive and to determine IC network interactions subsequent to induced neural imbalances in the genesis of atrial fibrillation (AF). Activity from multiple IC neurons in the right atrial ganglionated plexus was recorded in eight anaesthetized canines using a 16-channel linear microelectrode array. Induced changes in IC neuronal activity were evaluated in response to: (1) focal cardiac mechanical distortion; (2) electrical activation of cervical vagi or stellate ganglia; (3) occlusion of the inferior vena cava or thoracic aorta; (4) transient ventricular ischaemia, and (5) neurally induced AF. Low level activity (ranging from 0 to 2.7 Hz) generated by 92 neurons was identified in basal states, activities that displayed functional interconnectivity. The majority (56%) of IC neurons so identified received indirect central inputs (vagus alone: 25%; stellate ganglion alone: 27%; both: 48%). Fifty per cent transduced the cardiac milieu responding to multimodal stressors applied to the great vessels or heart. Fifty per cent of IC neurons exhibited cardiac cycle periodicity, with activity occurring primarily in late diastole into isovolumetric contraction. Cardiac-related activity in IC neurons was primarily related to direct cardiac mechano-sensory inputs and indirect autonomic efferent inputs. In response to mediastinal nerve stimulation, most IC neurons became excessively activated; such network behaviour preceded and persisted throughout AF. concluded that stochastic interactions occur among IC local circuit neuronal populations in the control of regional cardiac function. Modulation of IC local circuit neuronal recruitment may represent a novel approach for the treatment of cardiac disease, including atrial arrhythmias.
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an emerging therapy for treatment of chronic heart failure and remains a standard of therapy in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy. The objective of this work was to characterize heart rate (HR) responses (HRRs) during the active phase of chronic VNS over a wide range of stimulation parameters in order to define optimal protocols for bidirectional bioelectronic control of the heart. In normal canines, bipolar electrodes were chronically implanted on the cervical vagosympathetic trunk bilaterally with anode cephalad to cathode (n = 8, 'cardiac' configuration) or with electrode positions reversed (n = 8, 'epilepsy' configuration). In awake state, HRRs were determined for each combination of pulse frequency (2-20 Hz), intensity (0-3.5 mA) and pulse widths (130-750 μs) over 14 months. At low intensities and higher frequency VNS, HR increased during the VNS active phase owing to afferent modulation of parasympathetic central drive. When functional effects of afferent and efferent fibre activation were balanced, a null HRR was evoked (defined as 'neural fulcrum') during which HRR ≈ 0. As intensity increased further, HR was reduced during the active phase of VNS. While qualitatively similar, VNS delivered in the epilepsy configuration resulted in more pronounced HR acceleration and reduced HR deceleration during VNS. At termination, under anaesthesia, transection of the vagi rostral to the stimulation site eliminated the augmenting response to VNS and enhanced the parasympathetic efferent-mediated suppressing effect on electrical and mechanical function of the heart. In conclusion, VNS activates central then peripheral aspects of the cardiac nervous system. VNS control over cardiac function is maintained during chronic therapy.
Maintaining wakefulness is associated with a progressive increase in the need for sleep. This phenomenon has been linked to changes in synaptic function. The synaptic adhesion molecule Neuroligin-1 (NLG1) controls the activity and synaptic localization of N-methyl-Daspartate receptors, which activity is impaired by prolonged wakefulness. We here highlight that this pathway may underlie both the adverse effects of sleep loss on cognition and the subsequent changes in cortical synchrony. We found that the expression of specific Nlg1 transcript variants is changed by sleep deprivation in three mouse strains. These observations were associated with strainspecific changes in synaptic NLG1 protein content. Importantly, we showed that Nlg1 knockout mice are not able to sustain wakefulness and spend more time in nonrapid eye movement sleep than wild-type mice. These changes occurred with modifications in waking quality as exemplified by low theta/alpha activity during wakefulness and poor preference for social novelty, as well as altered delta synchrony during sleep. Finally, we identified a transcriptional pathway that could underlie the sleep/wake-dependent changes in Nlg1 expression and that involves clock transcription factors. We thus suggest that NLG1 is an element that contributes to the coupling of neuronal activity to sleep/wake regulation.ChIP | EEG | gene expression | sleep homeostasis | synaptic plasticity S leep is crucial for learning, memory, and other functions essential for proper functioning of the brain and body (1, 2). These functions have been associated with the sleep recovery process, which defines a level of pressure for sleep that increases with wakefulness and dissipates during sleep and that is reflected by changes in sleep intensity (3, 4). Sleep intensity is indexed by electroencephalographic (EEG) markers of neuronal synchrony in delta frequencies (1-4 Hz) measured during nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep (5). During wakefulness, mechanisms favoring desynchrony in the delta range predominate, and the brain can maintain cognition, whereas during sleep, events promoting network synchrony mostly take place with high delta activity thought to be permissive of recovery (3, 6). The sleep recovery process has been hypothesized to originate and contribute to the maintenance of both synaptic and network equilibrium (6-8). This notion is supported by the observation that specific plasticityrelated genes may be directly involved in regulating sleep need (9). Certain clock genes may also directly contribute, in a circadian-independent manner, to the sleep recovery process (5, 9). However, the mechanisms underlying the capacity and requirement of the brain to switch from an alert desynchronized state to an unconscious synchronized state remain elusive.Glutamate, the main excitatory neurotransmitter of the brain, can induce long-term modifications of synaptic transmission and, thus, changes in network connectivity. This is achieved mainly via glutamate's action on two types of receptors: N-methyl-D-aspa...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.