The 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami unfairly hit the different ethnic groups of Aceh, Indonesia. About 170,000 Acehnese and Minangkabau people died in the Northern tip of Sumatra while only 44 Simeulue people passed away in the neighbouring Simeulue island located near the earthquake epicentre. Such a difference in the death toll does not lie in the nature of the hazard but in different human behaviours and ethnic contexts. The present study draws on a contextual framework of analysis where people's behaviour in the face of natural hazards is deeply influenced by the cultural, social, economic and political context. Questionnaire-based surveys among affected communities, key informant interviews and literature reviews show that the people of Simeulue detected the tsunami very early and then escaped to the mountains. On the other hand, Acehnese and Minangkabau people, respectively in the cities of Banda Aceh and Meulaboh, did not anticipate the phenomenon and were thus caught by the waves. The different behaviours of the victims have been commanded by the existence or the absence of a disaster subculture among affected communities as well as by their capacity to protect themselves in facing the tsunami. People's behaviours and the capacity to protect oneself can be further tracked down to a deep tangle of intricate factors which include the armed conflict that has been affecting the province since the 1970s, the historical and cultural heritage and the national political economy system. This paper finally argues that the uneven impact of the 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami in Aceh lies in the different daily life conditions of the ethnic groups struck by the disaster.
Le silence des combattantes : un aperçu de l’histoire des inong balèë à Aceh (XVIIe-XXe s.). La résistance féminine est présentée par l’historiographie comme un trait caractéristique de l’histoire d’Aceh. Pourtant, l’existence et le rôle des femmes combattantes, les inong balèë, ont presque été niés dans le conflit entre le Mouvement pour la libération d’Aceh (Gerakan Aceh Merdeka – GAM) et l’État indonésien (1976-2005). Le présent travail soutient la thèse selon laquelle une image héroïque de la femme combattante a été créée par l’historiographie et que loin de représenter la réalité, elle a eu un impact dommageable sur la reconnaissance contemporaine des femmes combattantes. L’article retrace l’implication des femmes acihaises dans la politique, en distinguant trois grandes époques. Tout d’abord le XVIIe siècle, à propos duquel les historiens juxtaposent le mythe de l’amirale Malahayati à la réalité du règne des quatre sultanes (1641-1699). Ensuite le XIXe siècle, avec les héroïnes Tjut Njak Dhien (1850-1908) et Tjut Meutia (1870-1910), dont les images magnifiées occultèrent l’existence d’autres figures féminines qui combattirent les Hollandais (1873-1912). Enfin, la guerre d’indépendance (1942-1945), où des femmes du peuple s’illustrèrent, tout comme lors du récent conflit, où elles apportèrent un soutien essentiel au GAM dès 1998.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.